After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 359850 - Compiling issues on sparc with Forte
Compiling issues on sparc with Forte
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: GStreamer
Classification: Platform
Component: gstreamer (core)
git master
Other All
: Normal minor
: 0.10.11
Assigned To: GStreamer Maintainers
GStreamer Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-10-05 11:12 UTC by Josep Torra Valles
Modified: 2006-10-05 15:34 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: Unversioned Enhancement

Attachments
Patch that fixes refered issues (1.41 KB, patch)
2006-10-05 11:17 UTC, Josep Torra Valles 		committed Details | Review
New patch version (2.19 KB, patch)
2006-10-05 14:34 UTC, Josep Torra Valles 		none Details | Review

Description Josep Torra Valles 2006-10-05 11:12:20 UTC 
Please describe the problem:
Unresolved symbol for inet_aton().
-Werror isn't suported by Forte but can be used -errwarn=%all for the same purpose.

Steps to reproduce:
Compile it

Actual results:


Expected results:


Does this happen every time?


Other information:
Comment 1 Josep Torra Valles 2006-10-05 11:17:15 UTC 
Created attachment 74048 [details] [review]
Patch that fixes refered issues
Comment 2 Zaheer Abbas Merali 2006-10-05 11:25:39 UTC 
2nd diff looks wrong, because it'll match Linux/Sparc and other Unixes with a Sparc chip which does not need -lresolv and won't match Solaris Intel which will probably require this.

You need to make it check for solaris.

1st diff to me looks ok.
Comment 3 Josep Torra Valles 2006-10-05 14:34:03 UTC 
Created attachment 74059 [details] [review]
New patch version
Comment 4 Tim-Philipp Müller 2006-10-05 15:11:17 UTC 
Btw, do we really want to add the -Werror equivalent for Forte by default for CVS builds?

I don't think this is a good idea unless we actually have a Solaris/Forte build bot. It's hard enough to keep gcc quiet with -Werror; without a build bot we will just make CVS unbuildable for folks using Forte.
Comment 5 Zaheer Abbas Merali 2006-10-05 15:34:48 UTC 
exactly what i was planning on setting up tomorrow :)