After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 350496 - have a hotkey for showing/hiding signatures in the article body.
have a hotkey for showing/hiding signatures in the article body.
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: Pan
Classification: Other
Component: general
pre-1.0 betas
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: 1.0
Assigned To: Heinrich Müller
Pan QA Team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-08-08 21:03 UTC by Søren Boll Overgaard
Modified: 2012-06-01 16:15 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Søren Boll Overgaard 2006-08-08 21:03:50 UTC 
Hello,

A Debian user submitted the following bug at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=245957:

--- 8< ---

I set signature color to white (on white), so that people's dumbass .sig 
blocks don't show up (unless I select the text in order to see it).  
However URLs in .sigs still show up, because they URL color overrides 
.sig color.

I need to be able to not enable URL highlighting at all, or somehow have 
URLs be white (in sigs) but black or ordinary in ordinary blocks.

--- 8< ---

I am not sure I completely agree with the submitters suggestion. I think it would be cleaner, and more generally useful to have a hotkey for showing/hiding post signatures.
Comment 1 Charles Kerr 2006-08-08 21:36:17 UTC 
While reading the original report I was thinking the same thing
you suggested -- cleaner just to toggle signature visability.
Comment 2 Charles Kerr 2007-01-22 05:30:56 UTC 
gnus and slrn both have the ability to hide signatures...
Comment 3 Heinrich Müller 2012-05-30 22:08:57 UTC 
This problem has been fixed in our software repository. The fix will go into the next software release. Thank you for your bug report.
Comment 4 Dominique Dumont 2012-06-01 16:15:24 UTC 
On behalf of the original Debian bug submitter: Cool, thanks :-)