After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 339082 - Add current version as a new photo
Add current version as a new photo
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: f-spot
Classification: Other
Component: General
0.1.x
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: 0.7.0
Assigned To: F-spot maintainers
F-spot maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-04-19 20:52 UTC by Anders Bo Rasmussen
Modified: 2010-05-25 12:50 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
add-current-version-as-new-photo.patch (5.51 KB, patch)
2007-12-28 14:38 UTC, Maxxer
none Details | Review

Description Anders Bo Rasmussen 2006-04-19 20:52:37 UTC
Sometimes I would like two different crops of the same picture to appear
in the database as two pictures with different tags. E.g. it is possible
to get two different pictures by cropping two different persons from the same
picture. So it would be great if both versions of the original picture
could appear as a real picture.
Comment 1 Bengt Thuree 2006-05-15 15:04:36 UTC
Perhaps a "Add current version as a new photo" function?

I am modifying the title to reflect this.
(original title was : Multiple version of the same picture)
Comment 2 Anders Bo Rasmussen 2006-05-15 18:45:19 UTC
Good! This is just the functionality needed, but described in a more clear way.

One thing have to be decided: Is the "current version" of the old photo still being kept as a version or is it deleted (moved) when the new picture is created.
Comment 3 Maxxer 2007-12-28 14:38:22 UTC
Created attachment 101730 [details] [review]
add-current-version-as-new-photo.patch

anyone wanna try? :-)
Comment 4 Roland Mas 2008-01-08 19:59:14 UTC
I like the idea, and the patch works for me.

I would suggest adding the reverse feature too: the ability to merge ("reparent") one image as a version of another.
Comment 5 Maxxer 2008-01-08 22:30:48 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)

> I would suggest adding the reverse feature too: the ability to merge
> ("reparent") one image as a version of another.

This feature is already available (for testing!) in svn. Compile with -D:ENABLE_REPARENTING
Comment 6 Maxxer 2009-08-06 10:04:28 UTC
implemented in

http://gitorious.org/f-spot/mainline/merge_requests/1096

needs test and push
Comment 7 Ruben Vermeersch 2010-05-25 12:50:44 UTC
Reparenting has been merged into master, will be in 0.7.0.