After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 337968 - Importing to Gnumeric with non-English chars from Lotus 1-2-3 files
Importing to Gnumeric with non-English chars from Lotus 1-2-3 files
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Product: Gnumeric
Classification: Applications
Component: General
1.6.x
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Jody Goldberg
Jody Goldberg
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-04-10 16:21 UTC by Alan Siu-Lung Tam
Modified: 2006-05-21 08:30 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
Sample file with Chinese chars (3.30 KB, application/vnd.lotus-1-2-3)
2006-04-10 16:23 UTC, Alan Siu-Lung Tam
Details
Screenshot by OOo 2.0 (93.49 KB, image/png)
2006-04-10 16:26 UTC, Alan Siu-Lung Tam
Details

Description Alan Siu-Lung Tam 2006-04-10 16:21:46 UTC
I'm trying to open Lotus 1-2-3 files with Chinese characters in Gnumeric. They
failed to be imported using the right encoding. Sometimes "?" appears, and
sometimes the sheet is empty.

OpenOffice.org 2.0 allows me to import those files. When I open the file, it
asks me which character set. I answered Big5, and then the file is opened
correctly, though they do not import any formatting.
Comment 1 Alan Siu-Lung Tam 2006-04-10 16:23:35 UTC
Created attachment 63152 [details]
Sample file with Chinese chars

The cells A1, A2, ... A11 contains Chinese text for numbers 1, 2, ..., 11 respectively.
Comment 2 Alan Siu-Lung Tam 2006-04-10 16:26:57 UTC
Created attachment 63153 [details]
Screenshot by OOo 2.0

This is how the Chinese text looks like
Comment 3 Morten Welinder 2006-04-10 18:20:53 UTC
Fixed in cvs HEAD.

There were two problems:

1. The default character set was assumed to be LMBCS' group 1.  The above
   file has it as group 0x12.

2. Group 0x12 was not implemented.  I am currently assuming that it is
   identical to "code page 950".  My docs only really say that it is based
   on that code page, but I am hoping this is good enough.
Comment 4 Morten Welinder 2006-04-11 01:55:22 UTC
One more fix was needed: the format for the cells was incorrectly set to ""
causing the cells to appear blank.  Now fixed.
Comment 5 Alan Siu-Lung Tam 2006-05-21 08:30:44 UTC
It works. Thanks!