After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 337658 - moving a song to the same playlist place drop it from the list
moving a song to the same playlist place drop it from the list
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 334826
Product: rhythmbox
Classification: Other
Component: general
0.9.3
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: RhythmBox Maintainers
RhythmBox Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-04-07 16:45 UTC by Sebastien Bacher
Modified: 2006-04-08 08:39 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Sebastien Bacher 2006-04-07 16:45:18 UTC 
That bug has described on https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/38613

"If I drag the file and place it exactly between it's upper neighbour and itself, the file is even removed from the playlist. That's worse!

I just notice that for the removal-issue you don't even need to play the file. Just drag any file in a custom playlist to the spot between itself and it's upper neighbour."
Comment 1 Alex Lancaster 2006-04-07 17:05:57 UTC 
This looks like a dupe of bug #336045 and is fixed in CVS.  Can't reproduce it with CVS, so closing as a dupe.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 336045 ***
Comment 2 Alex Lancaster 2006-04-07 17:12:08 UTC 
Wrong bug number.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 334826 ***
Comment 3 Sebastien Bacher 2006-04-07 20:18:03 UTC 
do you have any idea of what fixed it and if that would be easy to backport for dapper?
Comment 4 Alex Lancaster 2006-04-08 08:39:17 UTC 
No idea.  There have been so many updates/changes to the playlist code since 0.9.3/0.9.3.1 (check out the ChangeLog) that it is impossible to know which one fixed this bug, it was probably a side-effect of a lot other fixes and refactoring.  It would be easier to port current CVS than backport it to 0.9.3.1, IMHO.