After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 336152 - 'Minimum font size' setting can be confusing
'Minimum font size' setting can be confusing
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: epiphany
Classification: Core
Component: Preferences
git master
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Epiphany Maintainers
Epiphany Maintainers
: 448896 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks: 406520
 
 
Reported: 2006-03-27 07:25 UTC by Daniel Holbach
Modified: 2011-02-01 16:18 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: Unversioned Enhancement



Description Daniel Holbach 2006-03-27 07:25:31 UTC
Forwarded from: https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/epiphany-browser/+bug/36808

On Dapper, the minimum font size is settable in both the simple fonts panel and the detailed font view. They both seem to edit the font size, except if either is changed to a value below the other, that change does not take effect. Increasing either or decreasing either but keeping it above the other setting's value works.

The obvious fix is to remove one setting, or at least make the settings mirror each other. Having two settings for one thing is extremely confusing to me, though, even if they are mirrored. (bug 328499 would remedy that).
Comment 1 Mathieu Pillard 2006-04-03 20:25:55 UTC
I can reproduce this. Actually it's even worse, I can't seem to get any of the 2 fields to change the other, they just seem to be independant.
Comment 2 Christian Persch 2006-04-03 20:57:16 UTC
They are independent. The one in the main dialogue is the default setting, which you can override per-language-group in the Detailed dialogue.
Comment 3 Ilmari Vacklin 2006-04-04 09:08:46 UTC
Hi, I'm the original submitter on Launchpad. Thanks, chpe, for explaining the settings to me. However, I still think this is a bug (or perhaps I should submit a new bug?) because it is not obvious at all that this is what the two settings do.
Comment 4 Reinout van Schouwen 2006-07-14 19:50:56 UTC
I agree that it is non-obvious. Anyone have suggestions for a better interface?
Comment 5 Martin Ejdestig 2007-07-28 16:38:48 UTC
*** Bug 448896 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-07-29 11:41:51 UTC
Still valid.
Comment 7 freggy1 2007-08-08 19:50:35 UTC
Being that it's so non-obvious currently, I doubt anyone is using this as intended. Why not just drop this, and only have options to set default fonts. 

If you really don't want to do this, then change the first label to "Default mimimum font size". Then in the Detailed settings dialog, remove the seperator under the "For language" drop down box (it actually gives the impression that the language chosen is "seperate" from the options underneath it, while it's the opposite), and change the label to: "Font settings for language:". Indent the settings underneath it, so it's more clear that they are "subitems" of the language chosen.
Comment 8 Cosimo Cecchi 2007-08-08 20:13:10 UTC
I agree for the removal of the separator and for indentation of the underneath settings and the change of labels (maybe we can also use a bold label for the language selector), but I'm not convinced that this would be sufficient to make the dialog obvious, as Firefox's is like this, but if i did not read chpe's comment here, I would not have understood the logic behind it either.
I think that having the font set per-language is useless. A typical user just want to set the fonts and their size with a nice and understandable dialog and does not want to know the language logic behind it.
Comment 9 Kris Thomsen 2009-08-04 22:57:52 UTC
This is still valid in Epiphany 2.26.3.
It's not obvious that the one in the Detailed Font-thing is for the language - specially not with the separator.
Separators is by the way very ugly in any UI design.
Comment 10 Jeremy Nickurak 2010-01-19 05:32:39 UTC
2.29.x exhibits this problem.

Further, the "Minimum Font Size" doesn't actually seem to be a minimum. For example, on my display, the usual font size of 10 is just readable, but  epiphany with a minimum font size of 18 still is almost impossible to read. (Indeed, the mininum font size doesn't seem to apply...)

Whan does the "Minimum font size" mean exactly?
Comment 11 Reinout van Schouwen 2010-01-19 10:10:49 UTC
(In reply to comment #10)
> 2.29.x exhibits this problem.

Could you provide a test URL?
It might be just a bug in the webkit backend.
Comment 12 Jeremy Nickurak 2010-05-18 22:27:45 UTC
Facebook and slashdot both have relatively small fonts, even if the 'minimum font size' is set to something huge like 30pt. Epiphany's at version 2.30.2, webkit at 1.2.0
Comment 13 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2011-02-01 16:18:36 UTC
Fixed in master