After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 335388 - Example submission: IconView
Example submission: IconView
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gtkmm
Classification: Bindings
Component: reference documentation
2.5.x
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: gtkmm-forge
gtkmm-forge
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-03-21 18:14 UTC by R. Douglas Barbieri
Modified: 2006-03-22 13:41 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
Tarball of IconView example project (29.49 KB, application/gzip)
2006-03-21 18:15 UTC, R. Douglas Barbieri 		Details

Description R. Douglas Barbieri 2006-03-21 18:14:22 UTC 
Please describe the problem:
I have written two examples: one is a simple version which just loads a
set of icons (they come from free projects, so I think those images
should be okay to use, but IANAL). The second app, directory, loads
files in a local directory and allows you to double-click into subdirs.

You can find the source here: http://www.dooglio.net/source/iconview.tar.gz



Steps to reproduce:
1. 
2. 
3. 


Actual results:


Expected results:


Does this happen every time?


Other information:
Comment 1 R. Douglas Barbieri 2006-03-21 18:15:31 UTC 
Created attachment 61712 [details]
Tarball of IconView example project

Here is the tarball in case my webserver is unavailable.
Comment 2 Murray Cumming 2006-03-22 13:41:33 UTC 
I have added the simple example to cvs HEAD, with some formatting changes to match the existing examples. Please avoid these unnecessary changes: 
- please avoid tabs
- please put public stuff before protected and private stuff in the header.
- please put methods and functions before member variables.

I also removed the unnecessary use of TreeModelSort.

I'd prefer not to put the other example in right now, because it doesn't seem to demonstrate anything extra, and it might make people use it instead of FileChooserDialog.

Many thanks.