After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 328133 - Patch that fails to apply part of build process?
Patch that fails to apply part of build process?
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: GStreamer
Classification: Platform
Component: dont know
git master
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: NONE
Assigned To: Thomas Vander Stichele
GStreamer Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-01-22 06:38 UTC by Elijah Newren
Modified: 2006-03-28 19:25 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
po/Makefile.in.in.rej (621 bytes, text/plain)
2006-01-23 14:43 UTC, Elijah Newren 		Details

Description Elijah Newren 2006-01-22 06:38:48 UTC 
This may not be a bug, but thought I'd point it out just in case.  Trying to build GStreamer from HEAD using jhbuild, I see:

./autogen.sh --prefix /opt/gnome2 -- --disable-tests --disable-static --disable-gtk-doc
DEBUG: /opt/gnome2
+ passing --prefix=/opt/gnome2 to configure
+ options passed to configure:  --prefix=/opt/gnome2 --disable-tests --disable-static --disable-gtk-doc
+ check for build tools
  checking for autoconf >= 2.52 ... found 2.59, ok.
  checking for automake >= 1.7 ... found 1.9.6, ok.
  checking for autopoint >= 0.11.5 ... found 0.14.5, ok.
  checking for libtoolize >= 1.5.0 ... found 1.5.18, ok.
  checking for pkg-config >= 0.8.0 ... found 0.19, ok.
patching file po/Makefile.in.in
Hunk #2 FAILED at 305.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file po/Makefile.in.in.rej

The build continues on okay, but it seems really disconcerting to see an all caps 'FAILED' during the build process if I'm watching at just the right time.
Comment 1 Andy Wingo 2006-01-23 10:16:44 UTC 
Assigning to thomas. This rings a bell -- I think at one point I had to refresh my checkout. Dunno!
Comment 2 Thomas Vander Stichele 2006-01-23 10:33:00 UTC 
probably not a big issue.  maybe attach Makefile.in.in.rej so I can take a look at it.
Comment 3 Elijah Newren 2006-01-23 14:43:58 UTC 
Created attachment 57942 [details]
po/Makefile.in.in.rej
Comment 4 Thomas Vander Stichele 2006-01-27 11:40:38 UTC 
ok, that might actually be a slight problem.  could you give me the Makefile.in.in as well so I can see what causes it to reject ?
Comment 5 Elijah Newren 2006-03-17 02:31:24 UTC 
Sorry for lamely falling of the face of the planet and not responding sooner.  Anyway, I just tried this again and don't get the failure anymore so I'll just close this.