After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 315342 - Not able to see existing mails after configuring exchange account
Not able to see existing mails after configuring exchange account
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Product: Evolution Exchange
Classification: Deprecated
Component: Connector
2.3.x
Other Linux
: Normal critical
: ---
Assigned To: Connector Maintainer
Ximian Connector QA
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-09-06 10:21 UTC by Khasim Shaheed
Modified: 2005-10-10 10:24 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
Fixes this bug (2.17 KB, patch)
2005-09-08 07:37 UTC, Arunprakash
none Details | Review
Fixes this bug (2.24 KB, patch)
2005-09-08 08:54 UTC, Arunprakash
none Details | Review

Description Khasim Shaheed 2005-09-06 10:21:48 UTC
1.Create a new unix user account(Make sure that you are configuring evolution  
  for the first time)
2.Configure an exchange account for the first time and login

Observe that all folders show mail count properly but no mail is displayed in
the righthand side pane.

This is happening with the devel snaps dated,
evolution-exchange-2.4.0.0.200509050323-0.snap.novell.11.1
evolution-2.4.0.0.200509050323-0.snap.novell.11.1
evolution-data-server-1.4.0.0.200509050323-0.snap.novell.11.1
Comment 1 Sarfraaz Ahmed 2005-09-06 12:01:24 UTC
Adding an update : 

The user needs to restart Evolution to see his mails. 
Comment 2 Arunprakash 2005-09-08 07:37:52 UTC
Created attachment 51945 [details] [review]
Fixes this bug
Comment 3 Arunprakash 2005-09-08 08:54:30 UTC
Created attachment 51948 [details] [review]
Fixes this bug

Includes the lock while removing the hash table entry.
Comment 4 Sarfraaz Ahmed 2005-09-08 09:15:32 UTC
Yes, the patch in #3 looks good. Make sure you commit it to the HEAD as well as
the branch.
Comment 5 Khasim Shaheed 2005-10-10 10:24:18 UTC
It works fine now.