After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 314902 - evo-sharp-0.10 does not build with eds-1.3.8
evo-sharp-0.10 does not build with eds-1.3.8
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: evolution-sharp
Classification: Deprecated
Component: bindings
0.10
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Mike Kestner
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-08-31 01:56 UTC by Joseph Sacco
Modified: 2006-10-21 22:21 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Joseph Sacco 2005-08-31 01:56:55 UTC 
Distribution/Version: YDL-4.0.1

evo-sharp-0.10 does not build with eds-1.3.8. The problem is the lack of an
appropriate evolution-api-1.3.raw file for eds-1.3.8. 

I see that configure now sets the correct SO versions for eds-1.3.8, which is
good news. 

Suggested fix
--------------
Something needs to be added to configure.in along the lines of

   AM_CONDITIONAL(USE_EVO13, test "x$eds13" = "xyes")

./evolution/Makefile.am will need something like

   if USE_EVO13
   RAW_API = evolution-api-1.3.raw
   else if USE_EVO12
   RAW_API = evolution-api-1.2.raw
   else
   RAW_API = evolution-api.raw
   endif

For what it's worth,  I edited the ./evolution/Makefile to force it to use
evolution-api-1.2.raw, which allows evo-sharp to compile. The good news is
beagle-0.0.13.2 [CVS] actually runs. The bad news is I don't know if using the
evolution-api-1.2.raw file was the right thing to do.


BTW,  evolution-api.raw is missing from the 0.10 tarball.  It exists in CVS.

-Joseph
Comment 1 Ed Catmur 2005-09-03 12:46:03 UTC 
Confirmed here.

Analysis is incorrect; evolution-api.raw tracks CVS head, we do not bother with
eds before 1.2.x.

The actual problem is in Makefile.am:

EXTRA_DIST =			\
	$(ASSEMBLY).config.in	\
	AssemblyInfo.cs.in	\
	$(RAW_API)		\
	$(METADATA)		\
	$(customs)		\
	$(sources)		\
	$(TESTBOOK_CSFILES)	\
	$(TESTCAL_CSFILES)

since we need to package both evolution-api.raw and evolution-api-1.2.raw this
should be

EXTRA_DIST =			\
	$(ASSEMBLY).config.in	\
	AssemblyInfo.cs.in	\
	evolution-api.raw	\
	evolution-api-1.2.raw	\
	$(METADATA)		\
	$(customs)		\
	$(sources)		\
	$(TESTBOOK_CSFILES)	\
	$(TESTCAL_CSFILES)

otherwise tarball will only contain one or the other, depending on packager's
eds version.
Comment 2 Joseph Sacco 2005-09-03 13:31:40 UTC 
OK... 
So the question remains:

    Which evolution-api file should be used withh eds-1.3.8?

-Joseph
Comment 3 Ed Catmur 2005-09-03 20:59:09 UTC 
evolution-api.raw, as I said; the problem is that it is not being packaged in
the tarball.
Comment 4 Joseph Sacco 2005-09-03 21:35:25 UTC 
Ed,

Thank you for responding. 

For those of us who don't actually work with the internals of eds, the version
numbering is confusing.  eds version 1.3.8 installs a package configuration file
named

    evolution-data-services-1.2.pc

Hence the confusion.

-Joseph
Comment 5 Daniel Drake 2006-10-21 22:21:25 UTC 
Closing, version 1.4 is supported and the packaging problem has gone