After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 314072 - No keybindings for percision-scrolling of display area
No keybindings for percision-scrolling of display area
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: evince
Classification: Core
Component: general
0.3.x
Other All
: Low minor
: ---
Assigned To: Evince Maintainers
Evince Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-08-21 11:29 UTC by lists.h0lyd4wg
Modified: 2006-01-23 23:40 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.9/2.10


Attachments
Add keybindings for percision-scrolling (2.99 KB, patch)
2006-01-23 23:25 UTC, Ricardo Markiewicz
committed Details | Review

Description lists.h0lyd4wg 2005-08-21 11:29:08 UTC
Add a way to scroll the display area with a finer granularity than that offered
by normal step-wise scrolling. Mouse users can use the scrollbars, but there
needs to be a keyboard equivalent. From my experience with other apps, the
standard keybinding for percision-scrolling/positioning is Alt+Arrow.

Other information:
Maybe this functionality needs to be implemented in the standard
GtkScrolledWindow and not specifically in evince. Multiple apps can benefit from
it (for example, all document viewers).
Comment 1 Ricardo Markiewicz 2006-01-23 23:25:36 UTC
Created attachment 57969 [details] [review]
Add keybindings for percision-scrolling

2006-01-23  Ricardo Markiewicz  <rmarkie@fi.uba.ar>

  * shell/ev-view.c:

  Add keybindings for percision-scrolling of display area. Fix for the bug
  #314072.
Comment 2 Ricardo Markiewicz 2006-01-23 23:25:54 UTC
The patch add the presicion scrolling of display area.

I set by default 1/10 of adjustment->step_increment as scroll value, and set MOD1 (usually Alt key) as key modifier to this feature.

Tell me what you think
Comment 3 Nickolay V. Shmyrev 2006-01-23 23:40:26 UTC
Applied, thanks a lot