After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 310857 - POTFILES doesn't list some files containing translations
POTFILES doesn't list some files containing translations
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gdm
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.8.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: GDM maintainers
GDM maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-07-19 11:12 UTC by Sebastien Bacher
Modified: 2005-07-21 21:32 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
fixes the issue (652 bytes, patch)
2005-07-19 11:17 UTC, Sebastien Bacher
none Details | Review

Description Sebastien Bacher 2005-07-19 11:12:56 UTC
$ intltool-update -m
The following files contain translations and are currently not in use. Please
consider adding these to the POTFILES.in file, located in the po/ directory.

gui/gdmchooser-strings.c
gui/gdmsession.c
gui/gdmsetup-strings.c
utils/gdm-dmx-reconnect-proxy.c
Comment 1 Sebastien Bacher 2005-07-19 11:17:20 UTC
Created attachment 49399 [details] [review]
fixes the issue

List the 2 files with translations, the -strings.c are not useful since the
.glade files are already used. Any reason to use this generation of strings to
a .c files, that doesn't seem to be  common?
Comment 2 Tommi Vainikainen 2005-07-20 07:24:56 UTC
It seems that one of the translators has updated POTFILES.{in,skip}. Is this
worth being open because discussion about Glade generated *-strings.c files?
Comment 3 Brian Cameron 2005-07-20 18:52:37 UTC
This seems to be fixed in CVS head.  gdmsession.c and gdm-dmx-reconnect-proxy.c
are now in POTFILES.in.  I believe it's not necessary to include the *-strings.c
files since the glade files are translated directly.
Comment 4 Sebastien Bacher 2005-07-20 19:31:11 UTC
yeah, that's what I said, but is it useful to keep these files on the CVS?
Comment 5 Brian Cameron 2005-07-20 19:44:26 UTC
I'm not sure.  I notice that the *.gladep files reference them.  Should these
files be removed as well?  
Comment 6 Sebastien Bacher 2005-07-20 20:09:21 UTC
The .gladep files describe a glade project. they are not useful for a .glade to
use with libglade, you should probably drop them from the CVS too
Comment 7 Brian Cameron 2005-07-21 21:32:19 UTC
Fix in CVS head.