After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 306314 - Panel applet bundle system
Panel applet bundle system
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Product: bounties
Classification: Infrastructure
Component: Features
unspecified
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Bounty Bug List
Bounty Bug List
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-06-02 19:31 UTC by Olav Vitters
Modified: 2006-07-14 12:52 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Olav Vitters 2005-06-02 19:31:26 UTC
This is a bounty.  Please see
http://www.gnome.org//bounties/Features.html#306314 for more information.
Comment 1 Marco Barisione 2005-06-03 12:18:27 UTC
I am interested, can I have some details?
Comment 2 Hongli Lai 2005-06-03 12:34:56 UTC
I'd like to apply for this one.
Comment 3 Olav Vitters 2005-06-03 17:45:59 UTC
Davyd: I'm guessing you thought up this bounty. Can you add some details? Please
also add these details to bounties.xml (gnomeweb-wml/www.gnome.org/bounties/),
see HACKING for how to rebuild the rest (requires mono+php) or inform me.
Comment 4 Daniel Brodie 2005-06-05 16:37:04 UTC
Hello, I would like to apply for this bounty. I already have a working prototype
(just needs more testing and a little cleaning up) and would like to know if
someone finished this already (so I won't have to waste my time on the horrid
autotools for the install tools)
Comment 5 Danielle Madeley 2005-06-08 08:28:02 UTC
Hi, finally got back from Germany. Have done some thinking on how this should be
implemented, a lot of people seem very interested in it.

After discussion with Vincent Untz, I have started putting content on the wiki:
http://live.gnome.org/AppletsRevisited

We should use the Wiki to collaborate. I think this is a very multifaceted task
if done properly. It is also worth a lot of money. If a lot of people are
interested in this we should instead work together. I would much rather have an
excellent implementation where we all take a share of the money, then have 15
second-rate implementations and no one get any money.

Please share your thoughts with me:
 - technical thoughts on the wiki
 - administrative thoughts by email or on a different wiki page (or I guess in
   this bug)
Comment 6 Nat Friedman 2006-07-14 12:52:30 UTC
Closing all Google bounty bugs.