After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 305425 - Toolbar cancel button is always sensitive
Toolbar cancel button is always sensitive
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Shell
2.22.x (obsolete)
Other Linux
: Normal minor
: Future
Assigned To: Evolution Shell Maintainers Team
Evolution QA team
evolution[kill-bonobo]
: 254058 335484 352983 362041 534660 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-05-25 12:51 UTC by Christian Kirbach
Modified: 2010-10-13 21:39 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Christian Kirbach 2005-05-25 12:51:45 UTC 
The ABORT button in the main top toolbar seems to be /always/ selectable,
wheter there is any action going on that can be stopped (mail fetchin/sending 
etc.) or not. 
This is very distracting because I've wondered many times what Evolution might 
be trying to do all the time...

I suggest the ABORT button should only be selectable when there is an action 
going on which is indicated by the corresponding text in the status text bar at 
the bottom...

Evolution 2.2.1.1
Comment 1 André Klapper 2005-05-26 13:22:01 UTC 
adding UI keyword
Comment 2 ABDUL RAUF 2005-06-10 05:12:36 UTC 
Hope you are talking about 'Cancel'  button  because there is no other button 
called 'Abort' in main toolbar

confirming the issue,setting target mile stone as 'future'
Comment 3 Christian Kirbach 2005-06-10 08:47:25 UTC 
whatever the English translation of the button is ... retitling.
Comment 4 Calum Benson 2005-07-28 10:37:40 UTC 
Apologies for any spam... cc'ing usability-maint on all Evolution usability
bugs. Filter on EVO-USABILITY-SPAM to ignore.
Comment 5 André Klapper 2006-03-22 23:34:33 UTC 
*** Bug 335484 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 André Klapper 2006-08-26 14:58:20 UTC 
*** Bug 352983 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 André Klapper 2006-08-28 19:58:02 UTC 
*** Bug 254058 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-10-13 22:27:16 UTC 
*** Bug 362041 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 André Klapper 2008-11-23 15:59:24 UTC 
*** Bug 534660 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***