GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 301498
document requires password in evince but not acrobat
Last modified: 2006-08-06 10:27:23 UTC
Please describe the problem: The following document opens fine with adobe acrobat but evince states that it is locked and requires a password: http://ucfv.ca/ar/200505/UCFVTimetable.pdf The link is from http://ucfv.ca/ar Note that GPDF does this as well; I've not tried XPDF yet - so I'm not sure if this is a "default" password with adobe or whether evince is sharing a bug with GPDF. Steps to reproduce: 1. Open http://ucfv.ca/ar/200505/UCFVTimetable.pdf with evince. 2. 3. Actual results: Evince asks for a password to open the document. Expected results: Evince should just open the document. Does this happen every time? Yes. Other information:
A little more info; acrobat reader states "security method is password security" --- odd considering it opens without typing one, and that it is a public document.
Test with xpdf would be very useful.
Here's my test w/ xpdf. It printed that stuff out, then asked me for a password, I hit [OK] and it wouldn't let me see the document. [clarkbw@rhbw bin]$ xpdf UCFVTimetable.pdf Error: Unsupported version/revision (4/4) of Standard security handler Error: Couldn't read xref table Acroread 5 couldn't open the document. It popped up an error about decrypting it. [clarkbw@rhbw bin]$ pdf2ps UCFVTimetable.pdf ****This file uses an unknown standard security handler revision: 4 Error: /undefined in pdf_check_user_password
To the reporter, which version of acrobat was able to open this?
I'm using version 7 to read it. The site says version 6 is required - I couldn't read it with 5.
Hi, this looks like a bug with the PDF backend. Could you please follow these instructions to help get this bug fixed. Thank You. http://live.gnome.org/Evince/PopplerBugs#poppler
The FDO Bug is here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3498
*** Bug 321152 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 344497 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 346359 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***