After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 259536 - Missing Gadu-Gadu Messenger in Contact entry
Missing Gadu-Gadu Messenger in Contact entry
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Contacts
2.6.x (obsolete)
Other other
: Urgent enhancement
: Future
Assigned To: evolution-addressbook-maintainers
Evolution QA team
: 349162 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-06-03 07:39 UTC by Artur Flinta
Modified: 2006-09-08 16:29 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
Evolution patch (3.11 KB, patch)
2004-06-03 07:41 UTC, Artur Flinta
none Details | Review
EDS patch (8.36 KB, patch)
2004-06-03 07:41 UTC, Artur Flinta
none Details | Review
Fixed and tested verion of evolution Gadu-Gadu IM contact patch (3.10 KB, patch)
2004-06-12 23:26 UTC, Artur Flinta
none Details | Review
Fixed and tested patch which adds Gadu-Gadu support to stored IM's contacts in EDS (8.32 KB, patch)
2004-06-12 23:28 UTC, Artur Flinta
none Details | Review
updated Evo patch (3.03 KB, patch)
2006-02-13 14:54 UTC, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski
committed Details | Review
updated e-d-s patch (8.43 KB, patch)
2006-02-13 14:55 UTC, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski
committed Details | Review

Description Artur Flinta 2004-06-03 07:39:30 UTC
Description of Problem:

There is possibility in contact entry selecting
few popular instant messengers for contacting
person, but one the list is missing the most
popular messenger in my country (Poland) -
Gadu-Gadu, which is supported by Gaim. The most
important thing is that, Gadu-Gadu is informally
stndard for communication in my country, and other
IMs like MSN, Yahoo or ICQ are not in use. I've
made two patches for Evolution and Evolution Data
Server to fix this.
Comment 1 Artur Flinta 2004-06-03 07:41:18 UTC
Created attachment 43803 [details] [review]
Evolution patch
Comment 2 Artur Flinta 2004-06-03 07:41:51 UTC
Created attachment 43804 [details] [review]
EDS patch
Comment 3 Gerardo Marin 2004-06-04 00:10:01 UTC
Artur: please submit your patch to evolution-patches mailing list. You
may need to subscribe, see http://lists.ximian.com
Comment 4 Artur Flinta 2004-06-04 07:58:07 UTC
OK, done :) Thx for info.
Comment 5 Artur Flinta 2004-06-12 23:26:45 UTC
Created attachment 43850 [details] [review]
Fixed and tested verion of evolution Gadu-Gadu IM contact patch
Comment 6 Artur Flinta 2004-06-12 23:28:10 UTC
Created attachment 43851 [details] [review]
Fixed and tested patch which adds Gadu-Gadu support to stored IM's contacts in EDS
Comment 7 André Klapper 2005-03-05 14:46:08 UTC
adding "patch" keyword
Comment 8 André Klapper 2005-12-20 18:36:49 UTC
marking the first patches as obsolete because the latter ones are updates on them
Comment 9 Fryderyk Dziarmagowski 2006-02-13 14:54:01 UTC
Created attachment 59262 [details] [review]
updated Evo patch

updated fox 2.5.x
Comment 10 Fryderyk Dziarmagowski 2006-02-13 14:55:22 UTC
Created attachment 59263 [details] [review]
updated e-d-s patch

updated for recent e-d-s
Comment 11 Fryderyk Dziarmagowski 2006-02-13 15:12:58 UTC
We are using both patches since about 2 years in PLD Linux Distribution without smallest problems. Would be great to see them included upstream.
Comment 12 Sushma Rai 2006-02-14 05:04:10 UTC
This chnages the EContactFieldInfo[] structure and also
EContactField enum.
Changing the ABI was not allowed in 2.5.x, because it would
require changes in some other applications.

We can take this patch whenever we get approval for ABI breaks.
Comment 13 André Klapper 2006-04-29 16:16:32 UTC
didn't we want to break the ABI for 2.8 iirc, so this could be reviewed?
Comment 14 Sushma Rai 2006-05-04 04:55:01 UTC
I am not sure about ABI break during 2.8. 
Harish?
Comment 15 André Klapper 2006-05-04 08:53:30 UTC
(and i don't remember exactly where i read that, guess it had something to do with the camel version naming)
Comment 16 Fryderyk Dziarmagowski 2006-06-11 12:56:24 UTC
any chance to see it included?
Comment 17 Devashish Sharma 2006-07-14 09:54:38 UTC
thanks for the patch, but it cant be committed because I cant break the ABI.
Changing the structure EContactFieldInfo and enum EContactField will cause a lot of applications to break.
Comment 18 André Klapper 2006-07-14 12:24:45 UTC
devashish: so we can break the ABI for bug 313533, but not for this one here? can you explain that to me? :-)
Comment 19 André Klapper 2006-07-14 12:42:03 UTC
okay, seems because this would break just "too many apps"...
Comment 20 Fryderyk Dziarmagowski 2006-07-14 15:38:28 UTC
sad but true.
Comment 21 André Klapper 2006-07-15 09:45:36 UTC
devashish, what's the plan? ignore this patch? or can we get it in for early 2.9 and inform all of maintainers of depending apps, so they do have enough time to port their apps? if this is the defacto IM standard for poland, we should not ignore this...
Comment 22 Harish Krishnaswamy 2006-07-15 09:59:46 UTC
Seems to me that the ABI sanctity has already been violated - I suggest we go ahead and lump all the patches in one stroke with additional padding for future.
Can we attempt this in 2.8.x (the deadline is July 24)
Comment 23 André Klapper 2006-07-15 10:19:20 UTC
harish: thanks so much. if you would like to have my list of abi-break patches, just ask. :-)
Comment 24 André Klapper 2006-07-19 14:31:36 UTC
devashish: *POKE* - may i ask for some speed? deadline is on monday. thanks in advance.
Comment 25 Devashish Sharma 2006-07-24 13:12:52 UTC
Finally this in, so how many people were waiting for this.
cheer up andre.
Comment 26 Devashish Sharma 2006-07-24 13:15:40 UTC
Finally this is in, so how many people were waiting for this.
cheer up andre.
Comment 27 André Klapper 2006-07-24 15:22:26 UTC
great news! Devashish, thanks a lot! :-)
Comment 28 Fryderyk Dziarmagowski 2006-07-24 17:07:59 UTC
Big thanks to Andre - your involvement was incredible. You saved this bug from lost in the depth of bugzilla.
Comment 29 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-07-29 17:54:36 UTC
*** Bug 349162 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 30 André Klapper 2006-08-01 13:47:52 UTC
fryderyk, the next time i'm in poland you owe me a beer ;-)
Comment 31 Marcin Krzyzanowski 2006-09-08 16:29:18 UTC
ufffff