After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 162389 - gnome.org is not XHTML 1.0 transitional valid
gnome.org is not XHTML 1.0 transitional valid
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: website
Classification: Infrastructure
Component: www.gnome.org
current
Other All
: Low trivial
: 2.20
Assigned To: GNOME Web maintainers
GNOME Web maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-12-28 15:53 UTC by Luis Menina
Modified: 2007-07-26 01:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Luis Menina 2004-12-28 15:53:43 UTC 
The footer of the gnome.org webpage has "Optimized for standards" in it. The
"Optimized" keyword links to the W3C validator... That tols me that the page
wasn't valid.

To check it, just go to :
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fgnome.org%2F
Comment 1 Richard Hoelscher 2005-03-02 04:55:12 UTC 
It's validating now. Only two changes have been made to the page since this
report, one of which was four days ago, fixing an <img/> tag so that it would
validate.
http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gnomeweb-wml/www.gnome.org/index.html?r1=1.68&r2=1.69
Comment 2 Luis Menina 2007-02-19 20:02:21 UTC 
Seems the website is broken again...
Comment 3 Luis Menina 2007-05-17 14:22:42 UTC 
ping...
Comment 4 Quim Gil 2007-07-01 18:42:39 UTC 
We are not working on the current wgo anymore. Please check whether http://gnome.jardigrec.eu meets your needs or not. This is the website that will become www.gnome.org one of these days.
Comment 5 Ricky Zhou 2007-07-26 01:43:39 UTC 
This has been fixed in SVN, and www.gnome.org now validates.  

(http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fgnome.org%2F)
Comment 6 Karsten Bräckelmann 2007-07-26 01:47:10 UTC 
Closing RESOLVED FIXED as per the discussion on IRC and comment 5.