After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 158903 - Offline mode should be acknowledged by session handling
Offline mode should be acknowledged by session handling
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: epiphany-extensions
Classification: Deprecated
Component: general
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: epiphany-extensions-maint
Christian Persch
gnome[unmaintained]
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-11-21 11:52 UTC by gbz
Modified: 2013-05-27 16:12 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: Unversioned Enhancement


Description gbz 2004-11-21 11:52:20 UTC 
I tried to use the work-offline mode to preserve som pages (that require login)
before shutting down GNOME. I was hoping that next time I started GNOME,
epiphany would start in work-offline mode due to session handling. But it
didn't, and so those pages were redirected to the login page because I wasn't
logged in. And thus I lost those pages completely, because I didn't remember
exactly their location. While I don't care for that, I just want to request that
offline mode is also to be comprised by session handling.
Comment 1 Christian Persch 2004-11-25 23:32:23 UTC 
We're going to integrate the offline status with NetworkManager via DBUS.
Comment 2 Christian Persch 2005-01-10 00:13:39 UTC 
This is going to be tried as an extension first, so moving to epiphany-extensions.
Comment 3 André Klapper 2013-05-27 16:12:27 UTC 
According to its developer, epiphany-extensions is not under active development
anymore. (For reference: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-i18n/2013-May/msg00035.html and bug 700924.)

It is unlikely that there will be any further active development.

Closing this report as WONTFIX as part of Bugzilla Housekeeping - Please feel
free to reopen this bug report in the future if anyone takes the responsibility
for active development again.