After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 136912 - Website should mention xmlroff and libfo
Website should mention xmlroff and libfo
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: conglomerate
Classification: Other
Component: Website
CVS
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: conglomerate list
conglomerate list
gnome[unmaintained]
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-03-11 17:18 UTC by David Malcolm
Modified: 2017-12-22 12:50 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description David Malcolm 2004-03-11 17:18:45 UTC 
We have an optional, experimental dependency on libfo from xmlroff:
http://xmlroff.sourceforge.net/

We should mention this on the website somewhere.
Comment 1 Geert Stappers 2004-11-01 17:50:05 UTC 
Is the fo code still present in HEAD?
Comment 2 David Malcolm 2004-11-01 18:22:22 UTC 
libfo is a component of xmlroff.  It's a serious attempt to do the job that the
old "fo" code in Conglomerate was aimed at.

I believe the "fo" code should no longer be present in HEAD
Comment 3 Dave Malcolm 2005-05-10 22:11:30 UTC 
Some information on hacking on the website can be found here:
http://www.conglomerate.org/cvs.html
Comment 4 Owen Taylor 2013-09-29 18:52:19 UTC 
Removing gnome-love keyword from all conglomerate bugs, since the module is not currently actively developed.
Comment 5 André Klapper 2017-12-22 12:50:09 UTC 
Conglomerate is not under active development anymore. It is currently unlikely that there will be any further Conglomerate development.

Closing this report as WONTFIX as part of Bugzilla Housekeeping (bug 685689) to reflect reality. Please feel free to reopen this bug report in the future if anyone takes the responsibility for active development again.