After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 133391 - the asm mutex implementation is broken on SPARC
the asm mutex implementation is broken on SPARC
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: GStreamer
Classification: Platform
Component: gstreamer (core)
git master
Other Solaris
: Normal critical
: 0.7.5
Assigned To: GStreamer Maintainers
GStreamer Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-02-04 12:47 UTC by Stefan Sauer (gstreamer, gtkdoc dev)
Modified: 2005-08-15 01:49 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Stefan Sauer (gstreamer, gtkdoc dev) 2004-02-04 12:47:42 UTC 



+
Trace
    43800






    

  • 
#0
gst_atomic_int_add

    
                at gstatomic_impl.h
                  line
                  271

    

    • 

  • 
#1
gst_atomic_int_inc

    
                at gstatomic_impl.h
                  line
                  288

    

    • 

  • 
#2
gst_data_ref

    
                at gstdata.c
                  line
                  190

    

    • 

  • 
#3
gst_pad_event_default_dispatch

    
                at gstpad.c
                  line
                  3466

    

    • 








I've got this via command :
gst-launch-0.7 -v sinesrc ! audioconvert ! esdsink






Comment 1


alexander.winston





          2004-02-05 17:46:37 UTC
        



Adding the portability keyword.






Comment 2


Thomas Vander Stichele





          2004-02-06 15:50:56 UTC
        



what exactly is wrong ? where's the error beside the backtrace ? do
you have a proposed patch ?






Comment 3


Stefan Sauer (gstreamer, gtkdoc dev)





          2004-02-09 12:44:24 UTC
        



have a look at the short info ;-)

the sparc/asm of the solaris implementation for the mutex seems to be
broken (as indicated by the backtrace).
Unfortunately I can't provide a patch as I have not done any asm
coding for sparc.






Comment 4


David Schleef





          2004-02-11 17:45:17 UTC
        



I disabled it, so it uses the fallback implementation now.

I have a sparc machine arriving any day, so this will likely get fixed
correctly.