After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 133188 - Can't compile corba-defs.idl
Can't compile corba-defs.idl
Status: RESOLVED INCOMPLETE
Product: ORBit2
Classification: Deprecated
Component: IDL compiler
2.9.x
Other HP-UX
: Normal major
: ---
Assigned To: ORBit maintainers
ORBit maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-02-02 07:55 UTC by Jonas Jonsson
Modified: 2006-07-04 11:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.9/2.10


Description Jonas Jonsson 2004-02-02 07:55:14 UTC 
gmake[11]: Entering directory
`/alcesys/build/garnome-0.29.1/platform/ORBit2/work/main.d/ORBit2-2.9.2/include/orbit/orb-core'
(rm -f corba-defs.h corba-defs-stubs.c corba-defs-skels.c
corba-defs-common.c corba-defs-imodule.c corba-defs-skelimpl.c || true) >
/dev/null
../../../src/idl-compiler/orbit-idl-2 -I../../../src/idl/CORBA_PIDL
-I../../../src/idl/CORBA -I../../../src/idl/interop --noskels --nodefskels
--nostubs --noidata --nocommon --showcpperrors --define=Object=OObject
--define=TypeCode=TTypeCode --deps ./.deps/corba-defs.idl.P
../../../src/orb/orb-core/corba-defs.idl
orbit-idl-2 2.9.2 compiling
  mode, show preprocessor errors, passes: headers skel_impl imodule

../../../src/orb/orb-core/corba-defs.idl:205: Error: syntax error,
unexpected TOK_SRCFILE, expecting TOK_ENUM or TOK_STRUCT or TOK_UNION

** (process:19525): WARNING **: ../../../src/orb/orb-core/corba-defs.idl
compilation failed

** (process:19525): WARNING **: ../../../src/orb/orb-core/corba-defs.idl
compilation failed
gmake[11]: *** [corba-defs.h] Error 1
Comment 1 Kjartan Maraas 2005-01-11 13:10:54 UTC 
Has this been resolved in later releases?
Comment 2 Christian Kirbach 2006-07-04 11:47:47 UTC 
Closing this bug report as no further information has been provided. Please feel free to reopen this bug if you can provide the information asked for.
Thanks!