After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 119874 - Organize brushes into categories
Organize brushes into categories
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Product: GIMP
Classification: Other
Component: User Interface
git master
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: 2.8
Assigned To: GIMP Bugs
GIMP Bugs
: 142990 413845 492444 520050 (view as bug list)
Depends on: 589371
Blocks: 164946
 
 
Reported: 2003-08-14 12:26 UTC by Maurits Rijk
Modified: 2010-06-27 11:50 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Maurits Rijk 2003-08-14 12:26:24 UTC
I have written a plug-in that loads Photoshop brushes into the GIMP. The
only problem is that pretty soon you get 100s of brushes, which means you
quickly lose overview. Would be nice to organize these brushes somehow.
Comment 1 Sven Neumann 2003-08-14 12:51:28 UTC
This should be done for all data files, not only brushes. Just
implement it in the GimpData class and update the GimpData views
accordingly.
Comment 2 Maurits Rijk 2003-08-27 08:40:16 UTC
I haven't looked yet how other programs (PS, PSP) are handling this,
but I think it would be useful to store brushes, patterns, etc. in a
hierarchical way and have some sort of filemananager functionality in
the views so you can rename, delete and move brushes. Drag and drop of
course would be nice. For example, drag a .tub (PSP tube) file from
any filemanager and dropping it onto the brushes view would add it to
your set of brushes.
Comment 3 Sven Neumann 2004-05-24 07:07:38 UTC
*** Bug 142990 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Raphaël Quinet 2004-07-06 12:28:34 UTC
I'm not sure if anyone will ever work on this, but just in case here are some
links that could be interesting.  They describe the photoshop preset manager,
which allows the user to organize brushes, patterns, gradients and even actions
in different folders:
  http://webclass.ru/eng/Tutorials/Photoshop/Rearranging_brushes.html
  http://www.tiemdesign.com/HOWTO/2000/Nov/ps6preset/default.htm
  http://www.joycejevans.com/tutorials/PStutorials/ps6preset/Default.htm (dup)
  http://www.planetphotoshop.com/spivey4.html
  http://www.planetphotoshop.com/PeteBauer73.html  (bottom of menu screenshot)
I also like the tool presets:
  http://www.planetphotoshop.com/PeteBauer66.html
But of course, we should not just copy PS.  We should innovate...
Comment 5 Maurits Rijk 2004-12-03 09:44:00 UTC
Is there a way to create a new brush in GIMP? There is of course gimp_brush_new
since 2.2, but I can find no way to actually set the contents of a brush.
Comment 6 weskaggs 2005-01-23 17:17:52 UTC
This is way off topic for this bug report, but to answer, libgimp in HEAD now
contains a bunch of functions for setting properties of a generated brush after
it has been created using gimp_brush_new.
Comment 7 Amar Takhar 2006-04-12 08:02:18 UTC
I was going to open a new bug for brush organisation when I came across this one.

How hard would it be to make the brush pane organise via directories?

For example

brushes/default
brushes/brushset1
brushes/brushset2
...

In the list view you'd get something similar to

------ default ------
<list of brushes>
---- brushset 1 -----
<list of brushes>
---- brushset 2 -----
<list of brushes>

Currently the list is sorted by name anyway, while I havn't looked at the code myself wouldn't adding a further level to organise by heir then name be relativily trivial?  The extra advantage to this is you could in theory have an unlimited level of subcategories just add a further indentation to the headings similar to a bullet list.  This would solve the issue of large brush collections that could then be distributed pre-organised into sub categories.

I think implimenting this within the gimp is pointless, most brush sets come in their own directories it would be highly conveniant to mv <dir> ~/.gimp/brushes/<dir> then refresh.
Comment 8 Joao S. O. Bueno 2007-03-02 14:12:16 UTC
In early GIMP 2.3  development cycle, we talked a lot about creating categories to separate both Brushes, Gradients, Pallettes and Patterns so they would all get mor emanageable.

Unfortunatelly no one volunteered to implment this back them, and soa good idea jsut sateyd still due to lack of man power. We certainly will get this working at some point, but not for 2.4 GIMP.

Comment 9 Joao S. O. Bueno 2007-03-02 14:17:35 UTC
*** Bug 413845 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Martin Nordholts 2007-11-01 19:23:56 UTC
*** Bug 492444 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Sven Neumann 2008-03-03 10:14:39 UTC
*** Bug 520050 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Alexia Death 2009-01-22 13:17:44 UTC
Hasnt tagging fixed this bug?
Comment 13 Martin Nordholts 2009-01-22 17:15:10 UTC
We need to actually organize them, the tagging just enables us to. In particular we need to have a set of default tags and they must be translatable.
Comment 14 Martin Nordholts 2010-06-27 11:50:25 UTC
Let's just handle this in the scope of 589371. It's not a duplicate so I'm closing as OBSOLETE.