After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 119022 - new command line option to get the package .pot name
new command line option to get the package .pot name
Status: RESOLVED NOTABUG
Product: intltool
Classification: Deprecated
Component: general
unspecified
Other Linux
: Low enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: intltool maintainers
intltool maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-08-03 19:00 UTC by Carlos Perelló Marín
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: Unversioned Enhancement


Attachments
simple patch to get the .pot filename (1.66 KB, patch)
2003-08-03 19:01 UTC, Carlos Perelló Marín
none Details | Review

Description Carlos Perelló Marín 2003-08-03 19:00:41 UTC
The attached patch is needed to be able to use the new status pages code
I'm developing now.

It just add an option to print the module's .pot filename so we don't need
to change it every time a maintainer change it, we just relay on intltool
to get that name, this way all our problems about .pot files that are not
found will end forever, because if intltool gets a bad name, we get the
same bad name, so it will work :-P

Please, accept this patch as soon as possible and if it's possible, do a
new release with this patch in (and the other changes that menthos told us
at xml-i18n-tools mailing list).

Cheers.
Comment 1 Carlos Perelló Marín 2003-08-03 19:01:24 UTC
Created attachment 18877 [details] [review]
simple patch to get the .pot filename
Comment 2 Carlos Perelló Marín 2003-08-04 18:37:14 UTC
Ok, I just saw the --gettext-package option and it gives me the
feature I need, so this bug report could be closed.

:-P
Comment 3 Abel Cheung 2003-08-08 00:13:25 UTC
But Carlos, I do think this patch is sometimes useful, when trying to
determine package name without writing files, for debugging or
whatever reason...
Comment 4 Carlos Perelló Marín 2003-08-08 00:16:54 UTC
Ok then, I reopen it but with low priority...
Comment 5 Carlos Perelló Marín 2003-09-04 19:40:11 UTC
Changed the summary to reflect the real status for this bug report.
Comment 6 Kenneth Rohde Christiansen 2004-01-07 17:23:40 UTC
I don't know what I should do with this one?
Comment 7 Carlos Perelló Marín 2004-01-07 18:05:09 UTC
intltool has already the feature I need.

Abel?
Comment 8 Abel Cheung 2004-01-09 18:25:43 UTC
Hmmm, seems not as important as I had thought. Originally I thought
that some people may be interested in getting the pot file name, but
time proves I'm wrong :-)
So it can be closed.