After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 115360 - [cli-tools] gst-inspect should integrate better with the command line
[cli-tools] gst-inspect should integrate better with the command line
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: GStreamer
Classification: Platform
Component: gstreamer (core)
git master
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: NONE
Assigned To: GStreamer Maintainers
GStreamer Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-06-17 13:24 UTC by Benjamin Otte (Company)
Modified: 2010-03-23 13:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Benjamin Otte (Company) 2003-06-17 13:24:04 UTC
Currently it is not easily possible to use gst-inspect for scripts on the
command line.
It would be nice if it included options so you could reduce the output.
Comment 1 Thomas Vander Stichele 2004-02-11 18:52:50 UTC
what would you want specifically ?
Comment 2 Benjamin Otte (Company) 2004-02-12 15:57:33 UTC
(Those are all just examples)
to get all typefind functions:
gst-inspect --plugins | grep "typefindfunction"
to get all GPL plugins:
gst-inspect --plugins --license | grep "[^L]GPL"
to get number of elements I wrote:
gst-inspect --author | grep "Benjamin Otte" | wc -l
to get all elements that work with float audio:
gst-inspect --padtemplate-caps | grep "audio-x-raw-float"
Comment 3 David Schleef 2008-08-09 01:37:46 UTC
Is anyone going to work on this?
Comment 4 René Stadler 2008-08-25 20:15:47 UTC
I doubt anybody wants to waste time implementing this.  For usage in scripts we have nice bindings to multiple scripting languages.  For people to quickly get to filtered information like this, I'm developing gst-inspector (which is faster and easier than using any command-line interface anyways).
Comment 5 Benjamin Otte (Company) 2008-08-26 06:37:28 UTC
It seems there's not a lot of need for functionality like this, but I'm not sure if this comes from there really being no need or people not realizing the potential.
That said, it doesn't look like anybody will be working on this, so if you wanna close it as WONTFIX go ahead. I still think it's a valid bug to keep open though.
Comment 6 Tim-Philipp Müller 2010-03-23 13:47:40 UTC
Don't see much point in keeping this open. A more scriptable gst-inspect-query kind of thing would best be done as a new separate tool anyway IMHO, and I also agree with Rene's sentiment that scripting languages like python are much better suited for this kind of thing. Also don't *really* see the use-case for any of this.