After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 115149 - PageUp in 'less' has gone a bit haywire
PageUp in 'less' has gone a bit haywire
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 120401
Product: vte
Classification: Core
Component: general
0.10.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: VTE Maintainers
Nalin Dahyabhai
: 124328 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-06-13 21:05 UTC by Scott James Remnant
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.5/2.6



Description Scott James Remnant 2003-06-13 21:05:22 UTC
Debian Bug#190651 (summary below includes patch)


Having trouble with 'gnome-terminal' for the last few weeks.

I start 'gnome-terminal', then run 'less' on some text file.  
Press 'PageDown' a few times.  All is well.

Things get funny  when I  press 'PageUp'.  It's hard
to describe, so here are some pictures of a sample of text, and several
virtual 5 line "screen shots".  (25 lines would be too much to "draw"!)

Suppose I'm looking at 8 lines of text:

1              in their entirety;
2          (c) the copies give obvious credit to the author, Hank Leukart;
3          (d) the copies are in electronic form.
4    II. To distribute this work, or copies made under the provisions
5        above, so long as
6          (a) this is the original work and not a derivative form;
7          (b) you do not charge a fee for copying or for distribution;
8          (c) you ensure that the distributed form includes the copyright

And the 5 line screen with 'less' (running under 'gnome-terminal')
looks like this:

    ********
        above, so long as
          (a) this is the original work and not a derivative form;
          (b) you do not charge a fee for copying or for distribution;
          (c) you ensure that the distributed form includes the copyright
    :
    ********

(The "********" represents the monitor edge.)

If I press PageUp, I'd see:

    ********
        above, so long as
        above, so long as
          (a) this is the original work and not a derivative form;
          (b) you do not charge a fee for copying or for distribution;
          (c) you ensure that the distributed form includes the copyright
    ********

...then:

    ********
        above, so long as
        above, so long as
        above, so long as
          (a) this is the original work and not a derivative form;
          (b) you do not charge a fee for copying or for distribution;
    ********

...then:

    ********
        above, so long as
        above, so long as
        above, so long as
        above, so long as
          (a) this is the original work and not a derivative form;
    ********

...then:

    ********
        above, so long as
        above, so long as
        above, so long as
        above, so long as
        above, so long as
    ********

...then:

    ********
              in their entirety;
          (c) the copies give obvious credit to the author, Hank Leukart;
          (d) the copies are in electronic form.
    II. To distribute this work, or copies made under the provisions
    :
    ********

...and then it stops.  The last "screen" above is what 'less' should show.
The bigger the terminal, the longer it takes to display.  PageUp is now
slow.

Notes:

PageUp works fine in programs like 'mc' or 'pinfo'.

Gnome-terminal's shift-PageUp back-scroll works fine too.

I don't think it's a 'less' problem.  Under other shells (the console,
or 'rxvt') 'less' behaves correctly.


> I can't find for you in wich package that bug is. For me this bug is
> unrteproducible.

Are you saying you can't reproduce this bug on your system at present?  Or
that 
you never were able to reproduce it?

Whatever the case, I've found the trouble.  Read on...

Earlier you mentioned that 'libvte4 0.10.28-1' fixed this.

Now the last entry in the upstream changelog.gz. is:

 2003-05-06 nalin
        * src/vte.c(vte_terminal_scroll_region): compare the top line to be
        scrolled to the scrolling delta instead of 0 (in HEAD, got lost
        somewhere).

...which sounds a lot like this bug.  Also some time after May 6th corresponds 
to when I noticed the scrolling worked right.

Whereas there's a later and earlier entry in the changelog.Debian.gz:

 vte (1:0.10.28-1) unstable; urgency=low

   * New upstream release.

  -- Christian Marillat <marillat@debian.org>  Tue, 13 May 2003 09:07:26 +0200

 vte (1:0.10.27-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream release.
  * Fix fonts size (Closes: #186705)

  -- Christian Marillat <marillat@debian.org>  Mon,  5 May 2003 13:13:52 +0200

May 5 is before May 6, but the upstream date could be a typo, or even a tardy 
annotation.  To test that, I ought to downgrade one version, and see how it 
works... 

(time passes)

Found older versions at:
 ftp://ftp.cerias.purdue.edu/pub/os/debian/pool/main/v/vte/

 ftpusers     68946 May  5 06:32 libvte-common_0.10.27-1_all.deb
 ftpusers    725536 May  5 06:32 libvte4_0.10.27-1_i386.deb

Note the dates.  May 5.

I installed (downgraded) both.  And after restarting 'gnome-terminal' the 
scrolling in 'less' works OK.  

So it seems that 1:0.10.27-1 fixed #190651, and 1:0.10.28-1 brought it back.  
Reopen Bug #190651 s'il vous plait?


I've had problems with this bug too, it started after catching back up
with unstable again.  The two versions of libvte4 I've tried, 0.10.28
and 0.10.29 both exhibit this bug.

I looked through the revision history of this bug, then scanned all the
mirrors to find a 0.10.27 release -- found one and downgraded libvte4
and libvte4-common to it, and that fixed the gnome-terminal problem.

So, having nothing better to do on a Friday evening, I hunted through
the diff of changes from 0.10.27 to 0.10.29 and tried reversing some of
them to see what was causing this weirdness.

The good news is I found a one-line change that fixes the problem.

diff -urN vte-0.10.29.orig/src/vte.c vte-0.10.29/src/vte.c
--- vte-0.10.29.orig/src/vte.c  2003-05-30 20:43:17.000000000 +0100
+++ vte-0.10.29/src/vte.c       2003-06-13 21:16:20.000000000 +0100
@@ -769,7 +769,7 @@
        /* We only do this if we're scrolling the entire window. */
        if (!terminal->pvt->bg_transparent &&
            (terminal->pvt->bg_image == NULL) &&
-           (row == terminal->pvt->screen->scroll_delta) &&
+           (row == 0) &&
            (count == terminal->row_count)) {
                widget = GTK_WIDGET(terminal);
                gdk_window_scroll(widget->window,

This reverses the change that Alfie guessed might be relevant (the
following is the upstream changelog entry):

 2003-05-06 nalin
        * src/vte.c(vte_terminal_scroll_region): compare the top line to be
        scrolled to the scrolling delta instead of 0 (in HEAD, got lost
        somewhere).
Comment 1 Scott James Remnant 2003-08-13 19:57:27 UTC
*tap*tap*tap*

Uh, is this thing on?

Hello?  Hello?  Mary had a little lamb...

Is anyone there?

CQ?  CQ?  This is W9GHXO here, come back?
Comment 2 devsk 2003-09-22 21:30:46 UTC
This is normal with VTE folks!! your find fixes my problem, on linux
as well as solaris.
Comment 3 Scott James Remnant 2003-10-31 07:53:30 UTC
Bugs don't go away if you ignore them guys :o)
Comment 4 Ross Burton 2003-11-21 12:49:35 UTC
*** Bug 124328 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Kiran Kumar Immidi 2003-11-21 13:06:13 UTC
The one line fix given above works with cvs on Red Hat 9. The patch
may be committed.
Comment 6 Mariano Suárez-Alvarez 2003-12-03 00:49:49 UTC
The patch attached to the 1st comment does not really fix the problem,
only its manifestation: the following patch has exactly the same
behaviour... Clearly, the problem is elsewhere.

diff -urN vte-0.10.29.orig/src/vte.c vte-0.10.29/src/vte.c
--- vte-0.10.29.orig/src/vte.c  2003-05-30 20:43:17.000000000 +0100
+++ vte-0.10.29/src/vte.c       2003-06-13 21:16:20.000000000 +0100
@@ -769,7 +769,7 @@
        /* We only do this if we're scrolling the entire window. */
        if (!terminal->pvt->bg_transparent &&
            (terminal->pvt->bg_image == NULL) &&
-           (row == terminal->pvt->screen->scroll_delta) &&
+           (FALSE) &&
            (count == terminal->row_count)) {
                widget = GTK_WIDGET(terminal);
                gdk_window_scroll(widget->window,
Comment 7 Ross Burton 2004-01-15 10:27:51 UTC
Still seeing this with VTE 0.11.10, sadly.
Comment 8 Frederic Crozat 2004-02-06 15:40:58 UTC
Hmmm, this bug seems to be a duplicate from #120401 which have a
different patch (from Owen)
Comment 9 Mariano Suárez-Alvarez 2004-05-10 05:52:02 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 120401 ***