After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 109828 - rpm spec files
rpm spec files
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: gnomemm
Classification: Deprecated
Component: build
2.0
Other All
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: gtkmm-forge
gtkmm-forge
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-04-02 23:44 UTC by Gary Peck
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
gconfmm spec file (1.47 KB, text/plain)
2003-04-02 23:44 UTC, Gary Peck
Details
libbonobomm spec file (1.48 KB, text/plain)
2003-04-02 23:45 UTC, Gary Peck
Details
libbonobouimm spec file (1.50 KB, text/plain)
2003-04-02 23:45 UTC, Gary Peck
Details
libglademm spec file (1.53 KB, text/plain)
2003-04-02 23:45 UTC, Gary Peck
Details
libgnomecanvasmm spec file (1.50 KB, text/plain)
2003-04-02 23:46 UTC, Gary Peck
Details
libgnomemm spec file (1.46 KB, text/plain)
2003-04-02 23:46 UTC, Gary Peck
Details
libgnomeuimm spec file (1.66 KB, text/plain)
2003-04-02 23:46 UTC, Gary Peck
Details

Description Gary Peck 2003-04-02 23:44:05 UTC
I'm attaching RPM spec files for gconfmm, libbonobomm, libbonobouimm,
libglademm, libgnomecanvasmm, libgnomemm, and libgnomeuimm. These should
work on at least RedHat 8 and 9 and probably on most RPM systems.
Comment 1 Gary Peck 2003-04-02 23:44:47 UTC
Created attachment 15414 [details]
gconfmm spec file
Comment 2 Gary Peck 2003-04-02 23:45:24 UTC
Created attachment 15415 [details]
libbonobomm spec file
Comment 3 Gary Peck 2003-04-02 23:45:39 UTC
Created attachment 15417 [details]
libbonobouimm spec file
Comment 4 Gary Peck 2003-04-02 23:45:55 UTC
Created attachment 15418 [details]
libglademm spec file
Comment 5 Gary Peck 2003-04-02 23:46:10 UTC
Created attachment 15419 [details]
libgnomecanvasmm spec file
Comment 6 Gary Peck 2003-04-02 23:46:32 UTC
Created attachment 15420 [details]
libgnomemm spec file
Comment 7 Gary Peck 2003-04-02 23:46:46 UTC
Created attachment 15421 [details]
libgnomeuimm spec file
Comment 8 Murray Cumming 2003-04-03 06:17:52 UTC
As I said in the gtkmm bug, these are all generated files, and you 
should be providing patches instead of whole files.
Comment 9 Gary Peck 2003-04-03 23:07:23 UTC
In the cases of gconfmm, libbonobomm, libbonobouimm, and
libglademm, there are no spec files in the distribution. So the full
file is equivalent to a patch.

libgnomecanvasmm, libgnomemm, and libgnomeuimm include spec files
which are completely broken and from gnomemm 1.x (circa 2001). The
attached files should just replace what's currently there.

As far as the files being generated, I'm sorry about that. I should
have attached .in versions of the files. However, the only difference
is that the first line of each file would be:
%define version		@VERSION@
instead of what's currently there. I'd rather save everyone some
bandwidth and not repost such a minor change.
Comment 10 Murray Cumming 2003-04-04 06:45:03 UTC
> In the cases of gconfmm, libbonobomm, libbonobouimm, and
> libglademm, there are no spec files in the distribution. So the full
> file is equivalent to a patch.

There should be. These should all be like gtkmm.

> libgnomecanvasmm, libgnomemm, and libgnomeuimm include spec files
> which are completely broken and from gnomemm 1.x (circa 2001). The
> attached files should just replace what's currently there.

No, they have spec.in files. Please provide patches.



I'm attaching RPM spec files for gconfmm, libbonobomm, libbonobouimm,
libglademm, libgnomecanvasmm, libgnomemm, and libgnomeuimm. These should
work on at least RedHat 8 and 9 and probably on most RPM systems.




------- Additional Comments From Gary Peck 2003-04-02 18:44 -------

Created an attachment (id=15414)
gconfmm spec file




------- Additional Comments From Gary Peck 2003-04-02 18:45 -------

Created an attachment (id=15415)
libbonobomm spec file




------- Additional Comments From Gary Peck 2003-04-02 18:45 -------

Created an attachment (id=15417)
libbonobouimm spec file




------- Additional Comments From Gary Peck 2003-04-02 18:45 -------

Created an attachment (id=15418)
libglademm spec file




------- Additional Comments From Gary Peck 2003-04-02 18:46 -------

Created an attachment (id=15419)
libgnomecanvasmm spec file




------- Additional Comments From Gary Peck 2003-04-02 18:46 -------

Created an attachment (id=15420)
libgnomemm spec file




------- Additional Comments From Gary Peck 2003-04-02 18:46 -------

Created an attachment (id=15421)
libgnomeuimm spec file




------- Additional Comments From Murray Cumming 2003-04-03 01:17 -------

As I said in the gtkmm bug, these are all generated files, and you 
should be providing patches instead of whole files.




------- Additional Comments From Gary Peck 2003-04-03 18:07 -------

In the cases of gconfmm, libbonobomm, libbonobouimm, and
libglademm, there are no spec files in the distribution. So the full
file is equivalent to a patch.

libgnomecanvasmm, libgnomemm, and libgnomeuimm include spec files
which are completely broken and from gnomemm 1.x (circa 2001). The
attached files should just replace what's currently there.

> As far as the files being generated, I'm sorry about that. I should
> have attached .in versions of the files. However, the only > difference
> is that the first line of each file would be:
> %define version		@VERSION@
> instead of what's currently there. I'd rather save everyone some
> bandwidth and not repost such a minor change.

No, please save us time by providing patches that I can just mark as
ready to apply.



        
Comment 11 Gary Peck 2003-04-16 23:57:16 UTC
> No, please save us time by providing patches that I can just mark
> as ready to apply.

Fine. Will do when I have a chance.
Comment 12 Murray Cumming 2003-07-08 16:49:59 UTC
I will cloee this bug if there is no chance of anyone doing this work.
Comment 13 Gary Peck 2003-07-09 03:37:35 UTC
I'm sorry, but I just don't have time to play these games. The .spec
files I provided work fine and are easy to integrate into the project:
just copy them over the old ones as those are completely obsolete. It
would take me much longer to create a patch out of them.

If you need them, you'll use them. If you don't need them, you won't.
I was just trying to help out and replace the old spec files, not take
on their maintenance.
Comment 14 Murray Cumming 2003-07-10 14:32:15 UTC
We wish to use the *.in files. Please respect our wishes.

We are not playing games. We have no intention of pretending to
support something that we have no interest in maintaining. If it isn't
important enough to you to do it properly then it isn't important to
you. So it's no loss.