After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 108757 - incorrect sort order for threaded articles
incorrect sort order for threaded articles
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: Pan
Classification: Other
Component: general
0.13.4
Other Linux
: Normal trivial
: 0.14.1
Assigned To: Charles Kerr
Pan QA Team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-03-19 13:25 UTC by Bruce Bowler
Modified: 2006-05-23 15:28 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
Screenshot of incorrect threading. (36.29 KB, image/jpeg)
2006-05-23 15:27 UTC, Artur Jachacy
Details

Description Bruce Bowler 2003-03-19 13:25:58 UTC
Using 0.13.4 but also noticed in many prior versions...

Perhaps I'm odd (I know I shouldn't leave anyone an opening like that :-)
but I have the groups I follow set to thread messages and sort ascending
by date.

For what I call base articles everything is hunky dory.  Early ones appear
at the top of the list, later ones appear further down the list.  The
problem is with replies.  As an example, in comp.lang.fortran, there's a
thread that starts with a message created 18-Mar-2003 12:22.  There are 3
replies.  The first one listed under that base article has a date of
18-Mar-2003 13:45, the second's date is 18-Mar-2003 13:18, the 3rd one,
which is actually the first reply is dated 18-Mar-2003 12:52.  The replies
are in the reverse order that I'd expect them in.   This situation is not
unique to this particular case.  It is uniform across the 40+ groups I
browse...

It would seem to me that replies ought to at least follow the same order as
base articles, but it might be better if they were always sorted ascending,
so that "next unread article" and similar actions would always be cronological.
Comment 1 Charles Kerr 2003-03-19 22:58:12 UTC
I 'fixed' this briefly before 0.13.4, only to discover that
the multipart handler relies on replies being sorted in the
order in which they're currently sorted.
Comment 3 Artur Jachacy 2006-05-12 22:42:53 UTC
It's back in 0.9x. Actually, the order is not even reversed, it's all mixed up.
Comment 4 Charles Kerr 2006-05-13 05:07:27 UTC
Re-fixed for 0.97. :)
Comment 5 Artur Jachacy 2006-05-15 20:56:11 UTC
It doesn't seem fixed to me. :-) I've deleted .pan2 and started afresh, but the threads are still reversed.
Comment 6 Charles Kerr 2006-05-15 21:24:49 UTC
Yup. re-re-fixed.
Comment 7 Artur Jachacy 2006-05-23 15:27:15 UTC
Created attachment 66063 [details]
Screenshot of incorrect threading.
Comment 8 Artur Jachacy 2006-05-23 15:28:32 UTC
I meant to say that it still happens in 0.98 in some threads.