After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 105234 - Summary properties page
Summary properties page
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 87374
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: File and Folder Operations
0.x.x [obsolete]
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-02-04 20:50 UTC by Loban Rahman
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Loban Rahman 2003-02-04 20:50:04 UTC
Currently, if I select several folders, then right-click and choose
properties, Nautilus will open a properties window for each folder.
Instead, it should do this: First it would open a dialog that asks simply:

Shall I
   () Open a property window for each folder
   () Open one property window for all folders

The options above could use some rewording. The first option is what
nautilus currently does. The second one produces a properties dialog that
summaries all the folders. In the "Basic" tab, you'll only have the
"Contents" and "Custom Icon" buttons. The "Share" tab is unchanged. The
"Permissions" and "Emblems" tab should also work, but will need a little
change.

In Windows, checkbuttons have a third level besides on and off - a half-way
between state that signals that this checkbutton is on for some things and
off for others. Does Gtk+ have this? This would be used in the "Emblems"
and "Permissions" tabs to indicate so-and-so is on for some folders, and is
off for others. Clicking checkbuttons toggles 'em between "on for all",
"off for all", and "back to the half-way state that everything was".
Comment 1 Loban Rahman 2003-02-06 19:21:05 UTC
When setting permissions for folders, could we also have a system to
allow propagating those permissions into files and folders inside that
folder. Sort of like doing a "chmod -r"?
Comment 2 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2003-02-07 19:22:11 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 87374 ***