After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 100751 - Revise frame implementation instructions for GNOME 2.6
Revise frame implementation instructions for GNOME 2.6
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gnome-devel-docs
Classification: Applications
Component: hig
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: HIG Maintainers
HIG Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-12-09 17:18 UTC by Murray Cumming
Modified: 2020-12-04 18:19 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
hig_gtkframe.patch (4.69 KB, patch)
2002-12-10 15:34 UTC, Murray Cumming 		none Details | Review

Description Murray Cumming 2002-12-09 17:18:08 UTC 
The section "Technical Details for Proper Layout" should just be deleted.
People should just use GtkFrame and hope that GtkFrame is fixed in future
to comply with the HIG.
Comment 1 Murray Cumming 2002-12-10 15:34:07 UTC 
Created attachment 12897 [details] [review]
hig_gtkframe.patch
Comment 2 Gregory Merchan 2002-12-11 08:16:31 UTC 
The instructions are commented out.
I'm leaving this open with the summary changed to
"Revise..." instead of "Remove..."
Comment 3 Dave Cook 2003-08-06 09:33:38 UTC 
Should this section be ignored now?  It doesn't seem to match up with
the diagram above it.  For example, the "technical details" specify
"Set the Spacing on the GtkHBox to 6," but the diagram shows a
horizontal spacing of 12 between label and control.
Comment 4 Murray Cumming 2003-08-06 09:42:14 UTC 
The technical details section should be completely updated for GNOME
2.6, which will be able to use the indented GtkAlignment from GTK+
2.4. I doubt that there will be any HIG release before then, so I
wouldn't worry until then.
Comment 5 Seth Nickell 2003-09-21 05:49:13 UTC 
Retitling.
Comment 6 Calum Benson 2010-03-06 01:23:31 UTC 
We removed the offending section several years ago :)