After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 92310 - add info keyboard shortcuts
add info keyboard shortcuts
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Product: yelp
Classification: Applications
Component: Info Pages
0.1
Other other
: Normal enhancement
: Future
Assigned To: Shaun McCance
Yelp maintainers
AP4
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-09-02 09:34 UTC by Trevor Spiteri
Modified: 2018-05-22 12:37 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Trevor Spiteri 2002-09-02 09:34:45 UTC
The yelp info browser is very clean, but I believe reading an info manual
would be faster if some info shortcuts were added, even if only n for next,
p for previous, u for up, t for top.
Perhaps they could also be used for other kinds of help files, where
Previous, Contents and Next are very often seen.
This would make it easy to browse a manual efficiently using only the keyboard.
Comment 1 Mikael Hallendal 2002-09-02 10:59:25 UTC
Hmm .. it sounds like a great idea to me, though I have no idea how it
would be implemented without making a TOC of info-pages before-hand
(which from what I've heard is a pretty large task).

I'll add the usability and Bill Haneman to the CC-line to hear if they
have any opinions on this.
Comment 2 Calum Benson 2002-09-05 13:42:22 UTC
Well, it is kind of against the letter of the current HIG to have
shortcuts that don't take a modifier, because you're more likely to
activate them by accident.  But I know GIMP and Evolution make heavy
use of these sorts of shortcuts too, so I don't know how long the HIG
will be able to maintain that position :)
Comment 3 bijan 2003-02-13 20:23:11 UTC
Each node in an info document lists a "previous", "next" and "up"
node. So you don't need to generate a toc.

Also these are not really keyboard shortcuts. You're not supposed to
be able to type into info documents (they are documentation). Info
viewers are generally driven by the keyboard. It is like saying that
the gnome games that are played from the keyboard are using keyboard
shortcuts improperly. :)
Comment 4 Calum Benson 2003-02-19 15:28:12 UTC
True, I just can't help feeling they should be related to the existing
HIG-recommended shortcuts for browser apps[1]:

Up:      Alt-Up
Back:    Alt-Left, so Previous = Shift-Alt-Left?
Forward: Alt-Right, so Next = Shift-Alt-Right ?

[1] which Yelp doesn't currently implement either *cough* :)
Comment 5 Trevor Spiteri 2003-02-20 07:43:25 UTC
Metacity (I am talking about version 2.4.34) by default binds:

/apps/metacity/window_keybindings/move_to_workspace_left
Shift-Alt-Left

/apps/metacity/window_keybindings/move_to_workspace_right
Shift-Alt-Right

So this would create some conflict with that.
Comment 6 bill.haneman 2003-02-20 11:47:46 UTC
If that's a conflict with an already-recommended keybinding (from the
GNOME keynav proposals) then we should file a Metacity bug for that,
at least to keep the discussion going.

Certainly I think nobody should bind "Shift-foo" if "foo" is already
being used for 'next/forward' type navigation, since Shift is the
convention for reversing the direction of such navigation.  BY that
logic however, I think Shift is a poor choice of modifier to add to an
existing 'forward/back' binding.

IOW, if Alt-right is forward, should Alt-shift-right be 'back' ? Of
course that seems silly since we have 'Alt-left', but it's reason
enough to avoid using 'Alt-Shift-left'==Previous in this case, IMO.

What about PgUp and PgDn?  They would seem to make more sense to me,
perhaps with modifiers added.

Comment 7 Calum Benson 2003-02-20 13:04:41 UTC
There's no conflict as things stand, the HIG only recommends the
back/forward/up shortcuts (Alt-left/up/right) which don't clash with
anything.  But as Trevor points out, Metacity uses pretty much every
other available combination of <mod>+left/right, so choosing
obviously-related shortcuts for prev/next would be a problem.

PgUp and PgDn, well, they scroll the page up and down :)  And
Ctrl+PgUp/PgDn scroll it left and right.  So we can't really recommend
those either.  Alt+PgUp/PgDn could be a possibility though.
Comment 8 Calum Benson 2003-04-03 14:38:19 UTC
Updating status_whiteboard field to reflect A11Y team's assessment 
of accessibility impact.
Comment 9 Calum Benson 2003-08-07 16:16:39 UTC
Apologies for spam... marking as GNOMEVER2.3 so it appears on the official GNOME
bug list :)
Comment 10 Shaun McCance 2004-01-26 11:27:59 UTC
Info pages are temporarily out with 2.6, but this regression will be
addressed for 2.8.  I just wanted to post a heads-up to anybody
watching this bug that I currently have Alt+Up and Alt+Down working
for DocBook documents for previous resp. next.  I intend to use the
same keybindings for any other format for which Yelp can actually
figure a page structure.
Comment 11 Calum Benson 2004-10-21 16:41:55 UTC
Apologies for spam-- ensuring Sun a11y team are cc'ed on all current a11y bugs.
 Filter on "SUN A11Y SPAM" to ignore.
Comment 12 Calum Benson 2006-04-26 17:16:11 UTC
Apologies for spam... ensuring Sun a11y folks are cc'ed on all current accessibility bugs.
Comment 13 GNOME Infrastructure Team 2018-05-22 12:37:51 UTC
-- GitLab Migration Automatic Message --

This bug has been migrated to GNOME's GitLab instance and has been closed from further activity.

You can subscribe and participate further through the new bug through this link to our GitLab instance: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/yelp/issues/2.