After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 704913 - gnome-control-center-3.8.4.1 not compatible with heimdal kerberos
gnome-control-center-3.8.4.1 not compatible with heimdal kerberos
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Product: gnome-control-center
Classification: Core
Component: User Accounts
3.8.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Control-Center Maintainers
Control-Center Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2013-07-26 05:17 UTC by Pacho Ramos
Modified: 2021-06-09 16:27 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
user-accounts: Be compatible with Heimdal krb5 (2.12 KB, patch)
2015-08-06 12:49 UTC, Ting-Wei Lan
needs-work Details | Review

Description Pacho Ramos 2013-07-26 05:17:50 UTC
As reported downstream:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478194

It fails to build because:
- krb5.h is not under a subdir in heimdal
- krb5_get_init_creds_opt_set_out_ccache cannot be used with heimdal

This looks similar to:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615290

And also PLD linux is using a patch to checking for krb5_get_init_creds_opt_set_out_ccache
http://git.pld-linux.org/gitweb.cgi?p=packages/gnome-control-center.git;a=blob;f=krb5.patch;h=c29dcebc40b181562017f49b76e6d32a2f6e29af;hb=HEAD

Thanks
Comment 1 Ting-Wei Lan 2015-08-06 12:49:27 UTC
Created attachment 308848 [details] [review]
user-accounts: Be compatible with Heimdal krb5
Comment 2 Bastien Nocera 2015-08-17 19:00:41 UTC
Stef, Ondrej, could you please review and apply this?
Comment 3 Stef Walter 2015-08-17 19:36:32 UTC
This just conditionally comments out code. The feature would break due to the missing function call.

I'm not a big fan of having slightly different multiple dependencies ... optionally compiled against ... doing slightly different things. Doing something like that requires serious and long term investment from the interested party. 

Just #ifdefing away code that doesn't compile is a bad start.
Comment 4 Stef Walter 2015-08-17 19:37:59 UTC
Review of attachment 308848 [details] [review]:

At a very minumum this needs work. Up to Bastien to reject if he doesn't want to have combinatorial explosion in g-c-c deps.
Comment 5 Pacho Ramos 2016-06-25 14:05:40 UTC
Any updates on this? Thanks :)
Comment 6 Ting-Wei Lan 2016-06-25 15:20:24 UTC
Sorry, no, I don't have time to work on this now.
Comment 7 André Klapper 2021-06-09 16:27:35 UTC
GNOME is going to shut down bugzilla.gnome.org in favor of gitlab.gnome.org.
As part of that, we are mass-closing older open tickets in bugzilla.gnome.org
which have not seen updates for a longer time (resources are unfortunately
quite limited so not every ticket can get handled).

If you can still reproduce the situation described in this ticket in a recent
and supported software version, then please follow
  https://wiki.gnome.org/GettingInTouch/BugReportingGuidelines
and create a new bug report at
  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/issues/

Thank you for your understanding and your help.