After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 665834 - gnotski: Convert documentation to Mallard format
gnotski: Convert documentation to Mallard format
Product: gnome-klotski
Classification: Applications
Component: documentation
git master
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Maintainers of Gnome user documentation
Depends on:
Reported: 2011-12-09 02:26 UTC by Robert Ancell
Modified: 2015-01-26 11:15 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Description Robert Ancell 2011-12-09 02:26:08 UTC
Convert documentation to Mallard format
Comment 1 roopa 2014-03-17 08:35:31 UTC
Hi i am interested to do work on this bug, is any one working on this bug?
Comment 2 Michael Catanzaro 2014-03-17 12:19:19 UTC
Nobody is; go ahead!
Comment 3 Kat 2014-03-22 16:52:19 UTC
Please follow

…and don't block all available projects at the same time: pick one and let people know that the rest are free to take.
Comment 4 roopa 2014-03-24 14:16:26 UTC
Ok i don't know that wether i can work on one or more bugs, i will be work on one project(swell-foop).
Comment 5 Michael Catanzaro 2015-01-25 21:51:44 UTC
I've revised Rashi's Mallard help and merged it into master. A review from the docs team would be super.
Comment 6 Michael Catanzaro 2015-01-25 23:01:52 UTC
Um, Kat, I just noticed the wip/mallard-merge branch. Your timestamps are a couple hours prior to my mine. Did we really independently start working on this on the same day?

I will cede to you on whatever changes you want to make, since docs are your area. I've already merged my work into master, but you can revert it or diff our work with Meld or whatever as you please. (I did fix a couple inaccuracies, but I can go through it again when you're done to make sure nothing slipped through.)

In the interests of not completely stepping on your toes, I am going to look over Robots and Sudoku next, rather than continuing through the rest of Rashi's work....
Comment 7 Kat 2015-01-26 11:15:30 UTC
Yes, we did indeed!

If you're free at some point today, would be great to chat to you in IRC about these docs as I made a few changes in the preparation for merging which I would like to check about with you.

We're actually at the docs hackfest right now so please feel free to join us in #docs to coordinate docs work :)