After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 553529 - Create custom 404 page
Create custom 404 page
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: website
Classification: Infrastructure
Component: www.gnome.org
current
Other All
: High major
: ---
Assigned To: GNOME Web maintainers
GNOME Web maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-09-24 09:11 UTC by Thilo
Modified: 2011-06-09 14:18 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
this adds a very simple page 404.wml to gnomeweb-wml/www.gnome.org/404.wml (524 bytes, patch)
2008-09-26 23:39 UTC, Thilo
none Details | Review

Description Thilo 2008-09-24 09:11:45 UTC
As #335463 shows - if some page is not found the user just gets the ugly and unhelpful standard 404 page of Apache. I suggest we create some page that looks prettier, while at the same time tells the user where else he can go. It would already be good if this page has no other content than "The page you searched could not be found". I think that a customized 404 page is something every large website should have. This makes outdated links less harmful.
Comment 1 Thilo 2008-09-26 22:47:02 UTC
I can add some simple page.
Comment 2 Thilo 2008-09-26 23:39:59 UTC
Created attachment 119453 [details] [review]
this adds a very simple page 404.wml to gnomeweb-wml/www.gnome.org/404.wml

This 404 page is not enough to get nicer error pages. One would need to add something like:
ErrorDocument 404 /404.html 

for Apache.
Comment 3 Thilo 2008-11-22 17:32:45 UTC
Can we please have some comment after two months for such an important and longstanding bug. 404 means people might not come back! Dont expect people to all be geeks who know how to rewrite an URL!
Comment 4 Thilo 2008-11-22 17:36:09 UTC
This pages gives a nice overview what can also be done:

http://alistapart.com/articles/perfect404/
Comment 5 Thilo 2009-11-07 23:14:14 UTC
Argh, still no solution. This is VERY,VERY unprofessional . For testing see URL: http://www.gnome.org/404

Increasing importance. We loose a lot users this way.
Comment 6 Lucas Rocha 2010-02-12 21:05:51 UTC
New website will take care of that I guess.
Comment 7 Thilo 2010-02-12 22:09:08 UTC
And new website will be released when? Just as a reminder The planniung started in Jula 2006 and should have been released with GNOME 2.16 in September 2006. so if any of your plans are outside the scale of 2 months I suggest you rather fix issues. Or you update http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb which says it will be ready 3 years after the first intended release date.

Making a 404 page alwas has been a work of less than a minute. I really have no clue why on earth people run after goals that are still missed nearly 4 years after the first ideas. Sure, sure, everything will be better after this new website - but nobody can tell us when its coming, otherwise the wiki pages would have been updated, wouldnt they?

Ans OTOH this is still something that needs to be created when a new website is running. So it does not make any sense closing it.
Comment 8 André Klapper 2010-02-12 23:19:01 UTC
(In reply to comment #7)
> And new website will be released when?
[snip]

Thilo, do you think your comment here was somehow constructive?
Comment 9 Thilo 2010-02-13 00:32:28 UTC
Sure. Do you think personal questions are?
Comment 10 André Klapper 2010-02-13 00:53:57 UTC
Okay, to rephrase it: Please don't add comments that do not add any additional value to bug reposts and are offtopic.
At least Lucas and others ARE working on it instead of just talking about it.
Thanks: your friendly bugmaster.
Comment 11 Thilo 2010-02-13 04:06:47 UTC
Okay rephrase it: look at the patch! Who has filed the bug? 

I have had enough. Removing my bugzilla account, will not file any more bug reports, will not povide any bit of help or patches any more. It does not make any sense to help. And you quite know that if you deny people like me access to subversion you cant blame THEM if they cant help.

I am sick of this attitude.
Comment 12 Andreas Nilsson 2011-06-09 14:18:58 UTC
(In reply to comment #7)
> And new website will be released when? Just as a reminder The planniung started
> in Jula 2006 and should have been released with GNOME 2.16 in September 2006.
> so if any of your plans are outside the scale of 2 months I suggest you rather
> fix issues. Or you update http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb which says it will be
> ready 3 years after the first intended release date.

And now we finally have a new website, with a custom 404 page and everything!
http://www.gnome.org/fail

Closing this as Fixed.