After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 345864 - Flickr upload doesn' uses reverse chronolic order
Flickr upload doesn' uses reverse chronolic order
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: f-spot
Classification: Other
Component: General
0.1.11
Other All
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: F-spot maintainers
F-spot maintainers
: 355030 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-06-25 10:31 UTC by Alberto Ruiz
Modified: 2007-09-10 15:21 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
this patch fixes the problem. (1.40 KB, patch)
2006-09-11 19:31 UTC, Gautier Portet 		none Details | Review
Patch for svn-trunk (878 bytes, patch)
2007-09-10 09:17 UTC, Giacomo Rizzo 		committed Details | Review

Description Alberto Ruiz 2006-06-25 10:31:16 UTC 
Please describe the problem:
Flickr uploading is in reverse chronologic order, but the oldest photo is the lastest being uploaded.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Take a group of photos and upload it into flickr.
2. Look at the order.


Actual results:


Expected results:


Does this happen every time?


Other information:
I tried to write a patch, but I see no obvious way to reverse de IBrowsableCollection in the Upload method inside FlickrExport.cs since it has no ToArray method.
Comment 1 Stephane Delcroix 2006-06-26 14:13:23 UTC 
> I tried to write a patch, but I see no obvious way to reverse de
> IBrowsableCollection in the Upload method inside FlickrExport.cs since it has
> no ToArray method.

You can easily cast an IbRowseableCollection to a Photo []

Photo [] photos = (Photo [])selected_photos.Items;

where selectephotos is an IBrowseableCollection.

You can also probably fix this by changing the 'order ascending/descending' before exporting and restoring it after the export...

my €.02
Comment 2 Lorenzo Delledonne 2006-09-08 23:27:22 UTC 
*** Bug 355030 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Gautier Portet 2006-09-11 19:31:30 UTC 
Created attachment 72563 [details] [review]
this patch fixes the problem.
Comment 4 Giacomo Rizzo 2007-09-09 19:12:50 UTC 
The proposed patch is probably outdated. Is this bug going to be fixed?
Comment 5 Giacomo Rizzo 2007-09-10 09:17:47 UTC 
Created attachment 95264 [details] [review]
Patch for svn-trunk

This patch should work for the moment. Thanks to sde for the help
Comment 6 Stephane Delcroix 2007-09-10 15:21:44 UTC 
committed in r3356