After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 341320 - nm-applet vanished from tray
nm-applet vanished from tray
Status: RESOLVED NOTABUG
Product: NetworkManager
Classification: Platform
Component: general
0.6.6
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Dan Williams
Dan Williams
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-05-10 19:54 UTC by Scott James Remnant
Modified: 2007-09-17 17:05 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Scott James Remnant 2006-05-10 19:54:57 UTC
Please describe the problem:
From: https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/43379

The Actors:
  Fire -- the stalwart DHCP server running Debian Stable (Sarge)
  Dib -- the noble laptop and DHCP client, possessing a heart of gold
  and an instance of nm-applet. Dib runs the latest Dapper (May 5th
  2006) running nm-applet version 0.6.2-0ubuntu5.
  Christian -- the mad scientist

The Scene:
  A dark and stormy night.
  Fire has already given Dib a dynamic IP addressed based on his wifi
  MAC address.
  Christian wants to make Dib's IP static when Dib is connected via wifi.

What Happened:
  Christian, sitting at his laptop, Dib, starts to edit the Fire's
  DHCPd configuration remotely via SSH. He sets Dib's wifi MAC
  address to return the same IP as the wired MAC does.

  Christian restarts the DHCP server. The next time Dib asks the DHCP
  server what it's IP address is, it will change from .189 to .16

  A few minutes later, Dib sends the DHCP request. All the SSH
  connections freeze (as expected) and the nm-applet shows its
  reconnecting to the network. As nm-applet gets to the end of its
  reconnect cycle, when it should have shown the wifi bars again, it
  vanishes.

  Christian confirms that nm-applet is still running. Christian tries
  to restart nm-applet, but to no avail... Christian checks the
  network, it is correctly configured, but nm-applet has lost its
  mind.

  A complete reboot is required to make nm-applet work again.

What was Expected:
  It should have "Just Worked".

Conclusion:
  nm-applet or network-manager didn't deal very well with the same
  network connection handing out a new IP address, even though this is
  acceptable DHCP behavior.

  Also, Christian gets into strange moods at time and submits bug
  reports with a bizarre sense of humor. But at least the reports are
  proof-read.

Steps to reproduce:


Actual results:


Expected results:


Does this happen every time?


Other information:
Comment 1 Robert Love 2006-05-25 20:37:37 UTC
This is probably the daemon exiting/crashing/breaking.  nm-applet is supposed to vanish from the tray in that case.

If NM is crashing, that is a legit bug, and should be filed with appropriate back trace.
Comment 2 Alex L. Mauer 2007-09-17 17:05:21 UTC
The daemon is crashing on my machine, causing this problem.

From the system log on my machine when this happens:

Sep 17 09:33:02 2360lnx NetworkManager: <WARN> nm_signal_handler(): Caught
signal 11. Generating backtrace...
Sep 17 09:33:03 2360lnx NetworkManager: ******************* START **********
************************
Sep 17 09:33:04 2360lnx NetworkManager: Using host libthread_db library "/li
b/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
Sep 17 09:33:05 2360lnx NetworkManager: [Thread debugging using libthread_db
 enabled]
Sep 17 09:33:05 2360lnx NetworkManager: [New Thread -1212422480 (LWP 4385)]
Sep 17 09:33:05 2360lnx NetworkManager: [New Thread -1229210736 (LWP 5567)]
Sep 17 09:33:05 2360lnx NetworkManager: [New Thread -1220818032 (LWP 4507)]
Sep 17 09:33:05 2360lnx NetworkManager: [New Thread -1212425328 (LWP 4501)]
Sep 17 09:33:05 2360lnx NetworkManager: 0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
Sep 17 09:33:05 2360lnx NetworkManager: ******************* END ************
**********************

Though that doesn't look like a useful backtrace.

How may one be obtained?