After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 92568 - [Solaris multihead] gnome-panel does not span screens when in xinerama mode
[Solaris multihead] gnome-panel does not span screens when in xinerama mode
Status: RESOLVED NOTABUG
Product: gnome-panel
Classification: Other
Component: panel
2.0.x
Other All
: Normal major
: ---
Assigned To: Panel Maintainers
Panel Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-09-05 12:03 UTC by robert.kinsella
Modified: 2015-03-24 13:00 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.0



Description robert.kinsella 2002-09-05 12:03:10 UTC
Gnome SUN beta2 build6 on Solaris sparc 8.

   Tested on both 
   1. multihead Ultra60 server 
   2. Sunray configured to operate in multihead mode
    
When system is brought up in xinerama multihead environment, the
gnome-panel does not span both screens. Both the top and bottom panel
should, when in a horizontal configuration, span both screens.
Comment 1 Mark McLoughlin 2002-09-06 07:05:20 UTC
Robert: believe it or not it takes quite a bit of code to make it this
way. I wasn't closing NOTABUG because I didn't want to implement it or
anything :-)

I personally think it makes more sense for a panel to not span the
logical screen because it seems more like a physical screen utility.
Anyway, George originally made it this way a long time ago, so I'm
cc:ing him and also usability-maint to get they're input.
Comment 2 Calum Benson 2002-09-10 12:42:29 UTC
Frankly, I have no idea, I've only ever used a multidisplay setup once
and that was years ago :)  From that experience I would say you
certainly might want different panel objects on different displays,
but whether or not that's better done with three different panels or
one long one I'm not sure.

One thing I guess I need to understand is: what happens if I
subsequently log into a single-display session?  If I'd set up three
panels on three displays, do I just lose whatever was on the other
two?  Or do they now all appear on my single display?  What about when
I log back into a three-display session again, do they all go back to
the right place?

Likewise, if I have one really long panel stretching across three
displays, and then log into a single display session next time... do I
get everything on my panel, but just really, really cramped?  :)  What
about when I then log back into my three-display session again, is it
all still cramped onto a single display?
Comment 3 Mark McLoughlin 2002-09-11 03:04:34 UTC
I think you may have hit the nail on the head Calum


> One thing I guess I need to understand is: what happens if I
> subsequently log into a single-display session?  If I'd set up three
> panels on three displays, do I just lose whatever was on the other
> two?

yes, they won't be visible on the single-display ...

> Or do they now all appear on my single display?

no 

> What about when I log back into a three-display session again, do
> they all go back to the right place?

yes, they should all come back just as they were in the multi-display
session ...

> Likewise, if I have one really long panel stretching across three
> displays, and then log into a single display session next time... do
> I get everything on my panel, but just really, really cramped?  :)  

yes, they'd be all crammed onto the one panel,

> What about when I then log back into my three-display session again,
> is it all still cramped onto a single display?

yeah, I'd imagine they'd all be still crammed on the single display

Comment 4 Calum Benson 2002-09-11 15:27:34 UTC
In that case it sounds like the current behaviour is probably more
useful as things stand, although no doubt we'll get some useful
feedback when people start using this stuff for real :)
Comment 5 Mark McLoughlin 2002-09-11 23:42:07 UTC
Okay, closing NOTABUG then