After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 88811 - panel crashed
panel crashed
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 59500
Product: gnome-panel
Classification: Other
Component: general
unspecified
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Mark McLoughlin
Mark McLoughlin
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-07-22 15:58 UTC by miller
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description miller 2002-07-22 16:05:23 UTC 
Package: gnome-panel
Severity: normal
Version: 1.4.0.8
Synopsis: panel crashed
Bugzilla-Product: gnome-panel
Bugzilla-Component: multihead-branch

Description:
added star-office 5.2 application to the panel at some time in the past.
 Sometimes
when I click on the star-office icon, the application loads and then i
get a report that
the panel has crashed.




Debugging Information:

(no debugging symbols found)...0x405a5319 in ?? ()

+ Trace 25326

  • #0 ??
  • #1 ??
  • #2 <signal handler called>
  • #3 ??
  • #4 gwmh_desk_notifier_add
  • #5 gwmh_task_notifier_remove_func
  • #6 gwmh_root_put_atom_window
  • #7 gwmh_root_put_atom_window
  • #8 ??
  • #9 ??
  • #10 ??
  • #11 ??
  • #12 ??
  • #13 gstc_parent_delete_watch
  • #14 ??
  • #0 ??
  • #1 ??
  • #2 <signal handler called>
  • #3 ??
  • #4 gwmh_desk_notifier_add
  • #5 gwmh_task_notifier_remove_func
  • #6 gwmh_root_put_atom_window
  • #7 gwmh_root_put_atom_window 




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2002-07-22 12:05 -------

The original reporter (miller@hbar.wustl.edu) of this bug does not have an account here.
Reassigning to the exporter, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
Reassigning to the default owner of the component, mark@skynet.ie.
Comment 1 Ben FrantzDale 2002-07-22 16:11:22 UTC 
This is a new stack trace, but it's also missing a lot of function
labels so I'm not sure.

This sounds a lot like bug 59500, but only by its symptoms.
Comment 2 Andrew Sobala 2002-07-22 17:59:17 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 59500 ***