GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 86764
Panel does not resize correctly when changing workspace switcher preferences
Last modified: 2004-12-22 21:47:04 UTC
Package: gnome-panel Severity: normal Version: 2.0.1 Synopsis: Panel does not resize correctly when changing workspace switcher preferences Bugzilla-Product: gnome-panel Bugzilla-Component: Panel Description: Description of Problem: I have a simple panel running along the bottom of my screen. It contains only the running applications and the workspace switcher applet. If I open the workspace switcher preferences dialog and check the 'show workspace names in the switcher' option then the applet grows to accommidate the needed space. When I uncheck the option the applet does not resize back to the correct size, and I am left with wasted space on the right side of the panel. ------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2002-06-28 15:22 ------- The original reporter (Matt_Lavin@oti.com) of this bug does not have an account here. Reassigning to the exporter, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org. Reassigning to the default owner of the component, gnome-panel-maint@bugzilla.gnome.org.
I don't really think this is a bug. The panel is designed to align things from a point on the left apparently, and thus if you make an applet larger and then smaller it moves left in the case where it is on the right end. However, the panel could be extended sometime in the future to check if something is on the far right edge, and align it from the right if it is. Even then, some people might not like this, since it would be slightly confusing, so it would have to be an option. And even if it were an option, it would be one for advanced users, and would probably be placed in gconf only. (most users wouldn't understand "Align applets on edge by point on edge". C. Evans
This bug looks similar enough to bug 85959 (they both cover the fact that the panel can leave odd gaps after applets are removed or change size) that I'm going to mark it a duplicate. Feel free to reopen if I'm missing some important qualitative difference, here. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 85959 ***