After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 76228 - brush scaling algorithm fails for large brushes
brush scaling algorithm fails for large brushes
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: GIMP
Classification: Other
Component: Tools
1.x
Other All
: Normal normal
: Future
Assigned To: GIMP Bugs
GIMP Bugs
: 132215 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks: 127786
 
 
Reported: 2002-03-25 11:09 UTC by ideasman
Modified: 2004-11-11 09:56 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description ideasman 2002-03-25 11:09:07 UTC 
when a VBR brush is bigger then 100 the brush renders with a white/grey
area in the middle of the brush preview.

PS it is inpossible to make a brush >  100 using the create brush button.
Comment 1 Sven Neumann 2002-08-27 16:04:45 UTC 
Yeah, that's a limitation of the scaling algorithm. It doesn't handle
brush sizes > 255 properly.
Comment 2 Alan Horkan 2003-07-23 18:41:20 UTC 
Changes at the request of Dave Neary on the developer mailing list.  
I am changing many of the bugzilla reports that have not specified a target
milestone to Future milestone.  Hope that is acceptable.
Comment 3 Michael Natterer 2004-01-22 16:52:44 UTC 
*** Bug 132215 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Joao S. O. Bueno 2004-01-22 17:37:30 UTC 
Sven, could you tell me in which file is this scaling algorithm? Is 
it in the GIMP or in GTK?
Comment 5 Michael Natterer 2004-01-22 17:50:55 UTC 
It's gimp/app/base/brush-scale.[ch]
Comment 6 Dave Neary 2004-03-10 10:50:36 UTC 
Bumping some small feature requests and low-priority bugs to the 2.2 milestone.

Dave.
Comment 7 Sven Neumann 2004-10-22 23:02:30 UTC 
Shouldn't block the release. But it should definitely be fixed at some point.
Comment 8 Jay Cox 2004-11-11 09:09:13 UTC 
Fixed in cvs head 2004-11-11
Comment 9 Sven Neumann 2004-11-11 09:56:00 UTC 
Thanks a lot :)