After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 761189 - sidebar minimal width too wide
sidebar minimal width too wide
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 674739
Product: evince
Classification: Core
Component: general
3.18.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Evince Maintainers
Evince Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2016-01-27 16:14 UTC by coreboc
Modified: 2016-09-29 19:45 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
evince - can't make the sidebar smaller than this (811.67 KB, image/png)
2016-01-27 16:14 UTC, coreboc 		Details

Description coreboc 2016-01-27 16:14:34 UTC 
Created attachment 319851 [details]
evince - can't make the sidebar smaller than this

not sure if this is related to #674739 but the sidebar of evince is simply too big; there is more white-space next to the thumbnails than the size of the thumbnails themselves. Fedora23, v. 3.18.2. Attached screenshot.
Comment 1 Germán Poo-Caamaño 2016-01-27 16:22:49 UTC 
What decides the width of the sidebar is the list box on top of the sidebar. The sidebar is going to be as wide as the longest text there.

I think this is a duplicated one, but I don't have time at this moment to look for the duplicate(s).
Comment 2 coreboc 2016-01-27 16:32:57 UTC 
i thought it's related to the list box items on top too; but the texts of the items are one word only and all smaller (narrower) than the actual thumbnails. even with margins and the dropdown/x buttons as they are now, the size could be reduced as the sidebar is too big for the small thumbnails now.
Comment 3 Germán Poo-Caamaño 2016-09-29 19:45:28 UTC 
Thanks for taking the time to report this.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 674739 ***