GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 744439
Gnome VPN settings dialog fails to pick up certificates when importing *.ovpn
Last modified: 2015-02-16 18:27:52 UTC
The Gnome VPN settings dialog fails to pick up certificates when importing *.ovpn, which makes it super-annoying to import Astrill files because I essentially need to extract all 4 certificates manually from the file, and just copy&paste them again into *.crt just so I can pick them as manual extra certificate files for Gnome. The original .ovpn file already has them in <ca> / <cert> / <key> / <tls-auth> tags respectively, and the Gnome VPN settings should *really* pick those up when importing.
It fails to pick up "key-direction 1" and the whole resulting "Using additional TLS authentication" with of-course also the including key too. I need to extract all of that manually. This should really be fixed, because you shouldn't expect the average user to be able to do this correctly - so right now, the import is essentially useless to them (and for me it's at least half useless).
This is the file in question with remote and all the certificate/key details removed. None of the certificates or keys listed imports at all, and TLS authentication with the additional key provided isn't activated either: setenv FORWARD_COMPATIBLE 1 setenv UV_SERVERID 377 client dev tun proto udp remote REMOVED nobind persist-key persist-tun ns-cert-type server key-direction 1 push-peer-info comp-lzo explicit-exit-notify verb 3 mute 20 reneg-sec 86400 mute-replay-warnings max-routes 1000 <ca> -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE----- REMOVED -----END CERTIFICATE----- -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE----- REMOVED -----END CERTIFICATE----- </ca> <cert> -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE----- REMOVED -----END CERTIFICATE----- </cert> <key> -----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY----- REMOVED -----END RSA PRIVATE KEY----- </key> <tls-auth> -----BEGIN OpenVPN Static key V1----- REMOVED -----END OpenVPN Static key V1----- </tls-auth>
Thanks for taking the time to report this. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 633337 ***