After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 694951 - Switching between frequent/all views is keynav unfriendly
Switching between frequent/all views is keynav unfriendly
Status: RESOLVED NOTABUG
Product: gnome-shell
Classification: Core
Component: overview
unspecified
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: gnome-shell-maint
gnome-shell-maint
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2013-03-01 19:27 UTC by Florian Müllner
Modified: 2015-03-07 06:40 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
theme: Add :focus style for app-view-controls (973 bytes, patch)
2013-03-01 19:27 UTC, Florian Müllner
committed Details | Review

Description Florian Müllner 2013-03-01 19:27:24 UTC
While it is possible to navigate to the switcher buttons at the bottom, it's not really friendly. So - do we want some custom shortcut here, or let <super>a cycle through windows->frequent->all, or resurrect <ctrl>PgUp/PgDown?

Attached patch just fixes the focus indication, which we should do in any case ...
Comment 1 Florian Müllner 2013-03-01 19:27:27 UTC
Created attachment 237735 [details] [review]
theme: Add :focus style for app-view-controls
Comment 2 Florian Müllner 2013-03-11 12:37:18 UTC
Ping?
Comment 3 Rui Matos 2013-03-11 17:18:12 UTC
Review of attachment 237735 [details] [review]:

You also need something like

.app-view-control:first-child:ltr:focus,
.app-view-control:last-child:rtl:focus {
    border-right-width: 1px;
}
Comment 4 Florian Müllner 2013-03-13 09:49:32 UTC
Attachment 237735 [details] pushed as 31774a7 - theme: Add :focus style for app-view-controls

Good catch, thanks!
Comment 5 Florian Müllner 2013-03-13 09:52:00 UTC
Didn't mean to close this - the committed patch is related to the issue, but doesn't really fix it.
Comment 6 Florian Müllner 2015-03-07 06:40:37 UTC
No activity here for two years, or discussion/complaints about this issue elsewhere - I'll take that as a hint that we don't need anything special then.