After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 648492 - segfault in calendar due to a11y
segfault in calendar due to a11y
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 643526
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Calendar
3.0.x (obsolete)
Other Linux
: Normal critical
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-calendar-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2011-04-22 22:51 UTC by rems14
Modified: 2011-06-29 12:14 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
Bug Trace (985 bytes, text/plain)
2011-04-22 22:53 UTC, rems14
Details
stack trace (533 bytes, text/plain)
2011-05-12 23:07 UTC, Kenneth Douglas
Details

Description rems14 2011-04-22 22:51:14 UTC
Mailer works fine but calendar not.
Comment 1 rems14 2011-04-22 22:53:10 UTC
Created attachment 186504 [details]
Bug Trace
Comment 2 Akhil Laddha 2011-04-23 12:23:37 UTC
Do you have accessibility enabled ?
Can you please disable it and confirm us if it fixes the crash, tia.
Comment 3 rems14 2011-04-23 21:46:31 UTC
Yes, disable accessibility fixes the crash !
Thanks.
Comment 4 Kenneth Douglas 2011-05-12 23:07:49 UTC
Created attachment 187750 [details]
stack trace
Comment 5 Kenneth Douglas 2011-05-12 23:11:34 UTC
having similar problems.

"evolution -c mail" launches the application without segfault but switching to calendar view segfaults or launching with "evolution" segfaults on launch.

stack trace attached above, please excuse separate comment.
Comment 6 Milan Crha 2011-06-29 12:14:48 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 643526 ***