GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 631119
introspection: Fix build by telling g-ir-scanner what the prefix is
Last modified: 2010-10-04 09:39:52 UTC
It's a really simple patch that applies to gnome-2-30 (and most probably master too). And it's needed if you use a recent g-i (something like 0.9.10).
Created attachment 171516 [details] [review] introspection: Fix build by telling g-ir-scanner what the prefix is
Is this urgent? Xan is away until next week I think. Looks ok to commit to me anyway, I'd say go ahead if we need this (I guess it's breaking seed support?).
It's urgent only if you want to build with a recent g-i. Else, it's not :-) So it's up to you. I have no idea if this breaks seed support, though... It really depends how the gir file was looking like before, and I don't have such a file anymore.
(In reply to comment #1) > Created an attachment (id=171516) [details] [review] > introspection: Fix build by telling g-ir-scanner what the prefix is I think the right thing to do now (~0.9.5) is to use --identifier-prefix and --symbol-prefix? --strip-prefix does not even appear in the manpage. But I could be wrong :)
(In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Created an attachment (id=171516) [details] [review] [details] [review] > > introspection: Fix build by telling g-ir-scanner what the prefix is > > I think the right thing to do now (~0.9.5) is to use --identifier-prefix and > --symbol-prefix? --strip-prefix does not even appear in the manpage. But I > could be wrong :) --strip-prefix is compatible with 0.9.3, which is used in some distros, though. That's what I chose this one.
(In reply to comment #5) > --strip-prefix is compatible with 0.9.3, which is used in some distros, though. > That's what I chose this one. Well, ephy master will be drinking the bleeding edge kool-aid in hardcore mode, so I don't think it's worth it doing this kind of thing. I pushed to master the fix using the 0.9.5 syntax.
Right, but what about gnome-2-30?