After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 625949 - gnome-panel blocks on unreachable NFS server
gnome-panel blocks on unreachable NFS server
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Product: gnome-panel
Classification: Other
Component: general
2.30.x
Other Linux
: Normal major
: ---
Assigned To: Panel Maintainers
Panel Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2010-08-03 15:19 UTC by Brian J. Murrell
Modified: 2020-11-06 20:23 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Brian J. Murrell 2010-08-03 15:19:09 UTC
I have a machine in my network which is frequently unreachable because it is only responsible for periodic processing and suspends itself until needed.  This machine NFS exports one of it's trees.

On my workstation, I have a few of the dirs in that tree in my gnome "bookmarks".  Inevitably, gnome-panel will end up blocked trying to stat one of those dirs.  When blocked, it's kernel stack looks like:

[441564.401013]  [<f8288dcc>] rpc_wait_bit_killable+0x1c/0x40 [sunrpc]
[441564.401013]  [<c058b7fd>] __wait_on_bit+0x4d/0x70
[441564.401013]  [<f8288db0>] ? rpc_wait_bit_killable+0x0/0x40 [sunrpc]
[441564.401013]  [<f8288db0>] ? rpc_wait_bit_killable+0x0/0x40 [sunrpc]
[441564.401013]  [<c058b8cb>] out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0xab/0xc0
[441564.401013]  [<c0167850>] ? wake_bit_function+0x0/0x50
[441564.401013]  [<f828950b>] __rpc_execute+0xdb/0x280 [sunrpc]
[441564.401013]  [<c058cdbd>] ? _spin_lock+0xd/0x10
[441564.401013]  [<f82896cc>] rpc_execute+0x1c/0x20 [sunrpc]
[441564.401013]  [<f828299f>] rpc_run_task+0x2f/0x60 [sunrpc]
[441564.401013]  [<f8282ace>] rpc_call_sync+0x3e/0x60 [sunrpc]
[441564.401013]  [<f8c8ce46>] T.1082+0x36/0x60 [nfs]
[441564.401013]  [<f8c8d6f7>] nfs3_proc_access+0xa7/0x170 [nfs]
[441564.401013]  [<c058cdbd>] ? _spin_lock+0xd/0x10
[441564.401013]  [<c021ae6c>] ? d_lookup+0x3c/0x50
[441564.401013]  [<c021965e>] ? __d_free+0x2e/0x50
[441564.401013]  [<c02196bf>] ? d_free+0x3f/0x50
[441564.401013]  [<c058cdbd>] ? _spin_lock+0xd/0x10
[441564.401013]  [<f828abac>] ? rpcauth_lookup_credcache+0x12c/0x1d0 [sunrpc]
[441564.401013]  [<f8c7905d>] nfs_do_access+0x7d/0xc0 [nfs]
[441564.401013]  [<f8c79129>] nfs_permission+0x89/0x1b0 [nfs]
[441564.401013]  [<c022098f>] ? mntput_no_expire+0x1f/0xe0
[441564.401013]  [<c0212f2c>] __link_path_walk+0x7c/0xca0
[441564.401013]  [<c0213d64>] path_walk+0x54/0xc0
[441564.401013]  [<c0213ee9>] do_path_lookup+0x59/0x90
[441564.401013]  [<c0214a31>] user_path_at+0x41/0x80
[441564.401013]  [<c020c89a>] vfs_fstatat+0x3a/0x70
[441564.401013]  [<c020c930>] vfs_lstat+0x20/0x30
[441564.401013]  [<c020c959>] sys_lstat64+0x19/0x30
[441564.401013]  [<c02141fd>] ? sys_renameat+0x20d/0x240
[441564.401013]  [<c01033ec>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb

Probably nothing surprising there.  Also, while gnome-panel is blocked, attaching a strace to it and then waking up the suspended machine yields:

Process 10315 attached - interrupt to quit
lstat64("/video/mythvideo", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0777, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
lstat64("/data/mp3/library", 0xbfa6a26c) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
lstat64("/video/mythtv", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0777, st_size=69632, ...}) = 0
lstat64("/mnt/cooker", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=1024, ...}) = 0

The strace of course blocks after the "Process 10315 attached - interrupt to quit" and then resumes when the suspended machine wakes up and the 'lstat64("/video/mythvideo", ...)' completes and gnome-panel becomes unblocked.

Any thoughts on how to prevent this problem, other than the two obvious solutions: (a) don't suspend the machine exporting /video or (b) don't bookmark dirs in /video?
Comment 1 André Klapper 2020-11-06 20:23:34 UTC
bugzilla.gnome.org is being replaced by gitlab.gnome.org. We are closing all old bug reports in Bugzilla which have not seen updates for many years.

If you can still reproduce this issue in a currently supported version of GNOME (currently that would be 3.38), then please feel free to report it at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-panel/-/issues/

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry it could not be fixed.