After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 608071 - bubbles don't disappear if they popup under the mouse
bubbles don't disappear if they popup under the mouse
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: notification-daemon
Classification: Other
Component: general
git master
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: notification-daemon-maint
notification-daemon-maint
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2010-01-25 20:56 UTC by William Jon McCann
Modified: 2015-04-16 22:43 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description William Jon McCann 2010-01-25 20:56:42 UTC
From part of http://trac.galago-project.org/ticket/73

"03/16/07 16:15:57: Modified by jwendell

    * patch_included changed.

As commented on a Ubuntu bug (http://launchpad.net/bugs/71055):

If a bubble pops up at the position where the mouse cursor is located, it doesn't disappear anymore. This is very annoying for me when using a thinkpad where the cursor most of the work is done by using the keyboard so I usually move the mouse cursor into a position where it doesn't annoy me.

What do you think about it? Maybe a gconf key to handle this?

09/04/07 13:49:09: Modified by herzi

    * status changed from closed to reopened.
    * resolution deleted.

I think the current behavior is broken. If the popup opens below the mouse cursor it doesn't disappear. A better solution to satisfy both people who want the bubbles to remain open and to close bubbles always automtically could be this one:

Don't listen to "enter-notify-event" and "leave-notify-event". Instead, listen to "motion-notify-event" and just reset the timeout everytime the mouse gets moved.

Tell me if you like this approach, and if you do: I can provide a patch (but I won't write one just to hear "nice work, won't fix").

03/18/08 21:44:27: Modified by chipx86

This would work. I'm fine with that change.
"
Comment 1 André Klapper 2012-04-03 13:46:34 UTC
Mass-fixing incorrect assignee and QA contact scheme for notification-daemon so interested people can follow its development. (See 606364#c1 for ref.)