GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 598879
crash in Panel: away from computer
Last modified: 2009-10-22 09:07:22 UTC
Version: 2.26.3 What were you doing when the application crashed? away from computer Distribution: Debian squeeze/sid Gnome Release: 2.28.0 2009-09-27 (Debian) BugBuddy Version: 2.28.0 System: Linux 2.6.30-2-powerpc64 #1 SMP Sun Oct 4 09:29:28 UTC 2009 ppc64 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10604000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: gnome GTK+ Modules: gnomebreakpad, canberra-gtk-module Memory status: size: 89575424 vsize: 89575424 resident: 15974400 share: 8192000 rss: 15974400 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615 CPU usage: start_time: 1255906372 rtime: 640 utime: 513 stime: 127 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-panel' [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0xf652d430 (LWP 7781)] 0x0f291adc in __lll_lock_wait () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
+ Trace 218406
Thread 2 (Thread 0xf652d430 (LWP 7781))
----------- .xsession-errors --------------------- Invalid rate plugin version 10002 Invalid rate plugin version 10002 Invalid rate plugin version 10002 Invalid rate plugin version 10002 Invalid rate plugin version 10002 Invalid rate plugin version 10002 Invalid rate plugin version 10002 Invalid rate plugin version 10002 Invalid rate plugin version 10002 Invalid rate plugin version 10002 Invalid rate plugin version 10002 Invalid rate plugin version 10002 Invalid rate plugin version 10002 Invalid rate plugin version 10002 Cannot access memory at address 0x8 --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. Unfortunately, that stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot to solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash. Can you get us a stack trace with debugging symbols? Please see http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so and reopen this bug or report a new one. Thanks in advance!
*** Bug 599254 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***