After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 593543 - Please remove unnecessary markup from glade files
Please remove unnecessary markup from glade files
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 593539
Product: anjuta
Classification: Applications
Component: plugins: document-manager
2.27.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Anjuta maintainers
Anjuta maintainers
Depends on: 593539 593545 593547 593548 593549 593552 593553 593554 593555
Blocks: 593540 593541 593542
 
 
Reported: 2009-08-30 11:35 UTC by Gabor Kelemen
Modified: 2009-08-30 12:34 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
Opening and saving ui file in Glade results this (9.52 KB, patch)
2009-08-30 11:35 UTC, Gabor Kelemen 		none Details | Review
Simple patch to remove markup (1.52 KB, patch)
2009-08-30 11:35 UTC, Gabor Kelemen 		none Details | Review

Description Gabor Kelemen 2009-08-30 11:35:09 UTC 
Created attachment 142028 [details] [review]
Opening and saving ui file in Glade results this

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #593539 +++

In the spirit of bug #96836, could Anjuta get rid of unneeded markup in
strings?

Most of these are in the plugins' glade files, and some of these were converted
to GtkBuilder without opening and saving them in Glade, I'll attach a bunch of
patches that only do this cleanup, before the actual patches that remove the
markup.
Comment 1 Gabor Kelemen 2009-08-30 11:35:52 UTC 
Created attachment 142029 [details] [review]
Simple patch to remove markup
Comment 2 Johannes Schmid 2009-08-30 11:58:18 UTC 
Could you please add all attachments to one bug and not create 20 bugs with the same title! Thanks!
Comment 3 Gabor Kelemen 2009-08-30 12:01:55 UTC 
Sure.
Comment 4 Gabor Kelemen 2009-08-30 12:34:42 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 593539 ***