After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 587326 - Seems that libxml2 is no longer hosted by ftp.gnome.org
Seems that libxml2 is no longer hosted by ftp.gnome.org
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Product: libxml2
Classification: Platform
Component: general
2.7.0
Other All
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: Daniel Veillard
libxml QA maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2009-06-29 16:23 UTC by David Ronis
Modified: 2021-07-05 13:27 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.27/2.28


Attachments
Proposed README file for ftp.gnome.org (197 bytes, text/plain)
2009-06-30 14:49 UTC, David Ronis
Details

Description David Ronis 2009-06-29 16:23:21 UTC
Please describe the problem:
I just got bit by configure in evolution's git/master branch.  Seems it want's libxml2.0 > 2.7.3; I can only find 2.6.30 on ftp.gnome.org.  According to some folks in #evolution that's because it's no longer officially hosted at ftp.gnome.org, but instead at ftp.xmlsoft.org.   A README to this effect should be added to the ftp.gnome.org directory.


Steps to reproduce:
1. 
2. 
3. 


Actual results:


Expected results:


Does this happen every time?


Other information:
Comment 1 Daniel Veillard 2009-06-30 12:42:45 UTC
libxml2 upstream has always been xmlsoft.org, at least for the last decade,
it's been exported in GNOME FTP for a while but after an argument with 
Mr Waught when I had to pull up a new release in urgency, I don't push
packages to GNOME FTP, others can but I don't do it. If someone want to
write a readme there, fine by me.

Daniel
Comment 2 Daniel Veillard 2009-06-30 12:45:48 UTC
See
http://xmlsoft.org/downloads.html

GNOME.org FTP server have always been listed as mirrors, and xmlsoft.org
as the main server. That page didn't change in years.

Daniel
Comment 3 David Ronis 2009-06-30 14:49:15 UTC
Created attachment 137627 [details]
Proposed README file for ftp.gnome.org
Comment 4 Matthew Barnes 2009-06-30 15:04:53 UTC
@Daniel: A bit off-topic here, but what started this was my using the new element traversal functions in Evolution without realizing they were only in the latest release.  To avoid this kind of thing in the future, would it be unreasonable for you to keep an index of new symbols by version in the libxml2 documentation?  Maybe not retroactively, but at least going forward?
Comment 5 Daniel Veillard 2009-06-30 15:48:51 UTC
W.r.t. #3 looks fine by me, no problem !

w.r.t. #4 I don't add much APIs those days (there is way too many already)
but on my TODO list is to add symbol versionning in the .so, so that will
force me to keep a list of new entry point and their associated release
version. So yes I expect this to improve.

Daniel
Comment 6 GNOME Infrastructure Team 2021-07-05 13:27:10 UTC
GNOME is going to shut down bugzilla.gnome.org in favor of gitlab.gnome.org.
As part of that, we are mass-closing older open tickets in bugzilla.gnome.org
which have not seen updates for a longer time (resources are unfortunately
quite limited so not every ticket can get handled).

If you can still reproduce the situation described in this ticket in a recent
and supported software version, then please follow
  https://wiki.gnome.org/GettingInTouch/BugReportingGuidelines
and create a new ticket at
  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/issues/

Thank you for your understanding and your help.