After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 581442 - crash in Evolution Mail and Calendar: Moving from a deleted ma...
crash in Evolution Mail and Calendar: Moving from a deleted ma...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 570329
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: BugBuddyBugs
2.24.x (obsolete)
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Evolution Triage Team
Evolution QA team
: 581275 581278 581324 581337 581628 581874 581938 581945 582498 582621 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2009-05-05 10:59 UTC by Dwayne Bailey
Modified: 2009-05-25 21:04 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.23/2.24



Description Dwayne Bailey 2009-05-05 10:59:30 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed?
Moving from a deleted mail to a new unread mail


Distribution: Fedora release 10 (Cambridge)
Gnome Release: 2.24.3 2009-01-16 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.24.2

System: Linux 2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.i686 #1 SMP Mon Mar 23 23:37:54 EDT 2009 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10503000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Enabled
GTK+ Theme: Nodoka
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 334680064 vsize: 334680064 resident: 125759488 share: 23494656 rss: 125759488 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615
CPU usage: start_time: 1241520749 rtime: 6544 utime: 5897 stime: 647 cutime:5 cstime: 9 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0xb7f3e990 (LWP 21460)]
[New Thread 0xb0a88b90 (LWP 22076)]
[New Thread 0xacc24b90 (LWP 22070)]
[New Thread 0xb0087b90 (LWP 22048)]
[New Thread 0xa81feb90 (LWP 22045)]
[New Thread 0xaec83b90 (LWP 21537)]
[New Thread 0xabf11b90 (LWP 21536)]
[New Thread 0xae284b90 (LWP 21501)]
[New Thread 0xaf686b90 (LWP 21499)]
[New Thread 0xb1489b90 (LWP 21496)]
[New Thread 0xb1e8ab90 (LWP 21495)]
[New Thread 0xb288bb90 (LWP 21493)]
[New Thread 0xb328cb90 (LWP 21492)]
[New Thread 0xb48fdb90 (LWP 21491)]
[New Thread 0xb52feb90 (LWP 21489)]
[New Thread 0xb5cffb90 (LWP 21488)]
[New Thread 0xb723bb90 (LWP 21486)]
[New Thread 0xb7c3cb90 (LWP 21485)]
0x00e12416 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 3 (Thread 0xacc24b90 (LWP 22070))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __lll_lock_wait
    at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/i486/lowlevellock.S line 136
  • #2 _L_lock_89
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #3 __pthread_mutex_lock
    at pthread_mutex_lock.c line 86
  • #4 segv_redirect
    at main.c line 423
  • #5 <signal handler called>
  • #6 strcmp
    at ../sysdeps/i386/i686/strcmp.S line 40
  • #7 maildir_summary_sync
    at camel-maildir-summary.c line 770
  • #8 camel_local_summary_sync
    at camel-local-summary.c line 306
  • #9 local_sync
    at camel-local-folder.c line 515
  • #10 camel_folder_sync
    at camel-folder.c line 306
  • #11 transfer_messages_exec
    at mail-ops.c line 987
  • #12 mail_msg_proxy
    at mail-mt.c line 520
  • #13 g_thread_pool_thread_proxy
    at gthreadpool.c line 265
  • #14 g_thread_create_proxy
    at gthread.c line 635
  • #15 start_thread
    at pthread_create.c line 297
  • #16 clone
    at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/clone.S line 130


----------- .xsession-errors ---------------------
warning: the debug information found in "/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2.2.debug" does not match "/usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2" (CRC mismatch).
warning: the debug information found in "/usr/lib/debug//lib/libuuid.so.1.2.debug" does not match "/lib/libuuid.so.1" (CRC mismatch).
warning: the debug information found in "/usr/lib/debug/lib/libuuid.so.1.2.debug" does not match "/lib/libuuid.so.1" (CRC mismatch).
warning: the debug information found in "/usr/lib/debug//usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.0.1.debug" does not match "/usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.0" (CRC mismatch).
warning: the debug information found in "/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.0.1.debug" does not match "/usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.0" (CRC mismatch).
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Akhil Laddha 2009-05-07 04:17:15 UTC
*** Bug 581628 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Akhil Laddha 2009-05-07 04:18:12 UTC
related to bug 571206 or bug 570329
Comment 3 Akhil Laddha 2009-05-09 03:56:41 UTC
*** Bug 581945 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Akhil Laddha 2009-05-09 03:56:54 UTC
*** Bug 581938 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Akhil Laddha 2009-05-09 03:59:33 UTC
*** Bug 581874 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Akhil Laddha 2009-05-09 03:59:43 UTC
*** Bug 581337 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Akhil Laddha 2009-05-09 03:59:52 UTC
*** Bug 581324 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Akhil Laddha 2009-05-09 04:00:41 UTC
*** Bug 581275 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Akhil Laddha 2009-05-09 04:00:56 UTC
*** Bug 581278 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Akhil Laddha 2009-05-09 04:01:47 UTC
@ Dwayne - please don't file duplicate bugs. 
Comment 11 Akhil Laddha 2009-05-14 04:51:57 UTC
*** Bug 582498 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Akhil Laddha 2009-05-15 03:44:48 UTC
*** Bug 582621 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 Akhil Laddha 2009-05-15 03:46:52 UTC
Milan, can you please look into this issue as Dwayne has rejected my request for not to file duplicates ;-)
Comment 14 Milan Crha 2009-05-21 16:48:08 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> related to bug 571206 or bug 570329

The later is the one. Not sure why this happened.
Dwayne, are you willing to help with some investigation? (I'm marking this as a duplicate, let's move there).

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 570329 ***
Comment 15 Dwayne Bailey 2009-05-25 07:57:59 UTC
@Milan: I can try, but I haven't been able to replicate this at all.  I move through a lot of email so its happening maybe 1% of the time.  I don't have that much time to spend on these though.
Comment 16 Milan Crha 2009-05-25 21:04:09 UTC
That's fine, thanks for the update.